A Systematic Literature Review in Cyber Forensics: Current Trends from the Client Perspective

Bryan Coronel, Priscila Cedillo, Karina Campos, Jessica Camacho, Alexandra Bermeo
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review in Cyber Forensics: Current Trends from the Client Perspective","authors":"Bryan Coronel, Priscila Cedillo, Karina Campos, Jessica Camacho, Alexandra Bermeo","doi":"10.1109/ETCM.2018.8580266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, with the demand of web applications there is also an increase in the number of problems and crimes that demand an investigation that requires digital forensics techniques in order to manage web evidence. Although there are several studies that address cyber forensics, they are mainly oriented to manage evidence at server side, as far as we know, no systematic literature reviews have been reported on how cyber forensics is addressed at clients’ side; considering the internationals standards. Thus, this paper presents a literature review about how cyber forensics is addressed at clients’ side related to techniques of identification, collection, analysis, preservation and report of digital evidence. Also, a review of how standards are being used in cyber forensics focused on the client side. The aim of this study is to provide a background of relevant activities that are considered by investigators to handle potentially digital evidence from web environments, considering what internationals standards are solving for this purpose. Thus, a total of 37 studies have been selected and analyzed in this study. Moreover, this study provides important insights about the need to create methodologies aligned with formal standards that support the management of the evidence in an appropriate way.","PeriodicalId":334574,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Third Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Third Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM.2018.8580266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Nowadays, with the demand of web applications there is also an increase in the number of problems and crimes that demand an investigation that requires digital forensics techniques in order to manage web evidence. Although there are several studies that address cyber forensics, they are mainly oriented to manage evidence at server side, as far as we know, no systematic literature reviews have been reported on how cyber forensics is addressed at clients’ side; considering the internationals standards. Thus, this paper presents a literature review about how cyber forensics is addressed at clients’ side related to techniques of identification, collection, analysis, preservation and report of digital evidence. Also, a review of how standards are being used in cyber forensics focused on the client side. The aim of this study is to provide a background of relevant activities that are considered by investigators to handle potentially digital evidence from web environments, considering what internationals standards are solving for this purpose. Thus, a total of 37 studies have been selected and analyzed in this study. Moreover, this study provides important insights about the need to create methodologies aligned with formal standards that support the management of the evidence in an appropriate way.
网络取证的系统文献综述:从客户角度看当前趋势
如今,随着网络应用的需求,也有越来越多的问题和犯罪需要调查,需要数字取证技术,以管理网络证据。虽然有一些研究涉及网络取证,但它们主要面向服务器端管理证据,据我们所知,没有系统的文献综述报道如何在客户端解决网络取证;考虑到国际标准。因此,本文介绍了有关客户如何处理与数字证据的识别、收集、分析、保存和报告技术相关的网络取证的文献综述。此外,对客户端网络取证标准的使用情况进行了回顾。本研究的目的是提供相关活动的背景,考虑到国际标准正在为此目的解决的问题,调查人员认为这些活动可以处理来自网络环境的潜在数字证据。因此,本研究共选取了37项研究进行分析。此外,本研究提供了重要的见解,说明需要创建与正式标准一致的方法,以适当的方式支持证据管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信