Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex: Prevalence of the Different Bacteria Involved in Pneumonia in the Iberian Peninsula

Santo Tomás H, Teixeira R, C. G., Lázaro S, Sánchez-Matamorors A, Villoria P
{"title":"Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex: Prevalence of the Different Bacteria Involved in Pneumonia in the Iberian Peninsula","authors":"Santo Tomás H, Teixeira R, C. G., Lázaro S, Sánchez-Matamorors A, Villoria P","doi":"10.16966/2576-6457.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bovine Respiratory Disease is the most frequent cause of disease and the main cause of death in cattle, which results in financial losses. The aim of this article is to present the prevalence of the different bacteria involved in Bovine Respiratory Disease in animals with respiratory symptoms in the Iberian Peninsula. Information was collected from a private laboratory, selecting the data from the analyses of the bovine respiratory disease panel performed between January 2017 and January 2020, which included the major respiratory pathogens. Samples originated from all across Spain (mostly from the North and Northeast) and Portugal. The type of sample was classified into four groups: organs, bronchoalveolar lavage, nasal and tracheal swabs. A farm was considered positive if at least one of the tests performed was positive to either real time qPCR or culture. Four hundred and fourty-eight reports were created representing 370 cattle farms with animals that showed respiratory symptoms. The observed prevalence of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis in the period examined was 32.8% (95% CI: 28.5%-37.2%), 55.6% (95% CI: 51.0%-60.2%), 24.1% (95% CI: 20.2%-28.1%), and 53.6% (95% CI: 49.0%-58.2%), respectively. Regarding the age of the animals in the reports examined, 7.4% (33) were samples from adult animals (beef or dairy cattle), 51.3% (230) were from fattening calves (feedlots), and 23.2% (104) were from veal calves. The age group or production system was not identifiable in 18.1% (81) of the remaining reports. As for the types of samples, the majority (58.5%) were organs from animals suffering from Bovine Respiratory Disease (lungs), followed by bronchoalveolar lavage (29.7%), nasal swabs (6.5%), and tracheal swabs (1.6%). In 3.8% of cases, the farms sent various types of sample together. In 88.3% of cases where a virus was detected, bacteria were also found. On the other hand, in 45.3% of all the reports, the only agents detected were bacteria. Bacteria were involved in at least 77.2% of outbreaks. These results confirm the need for preventing bacterial pneumonia to reduce the use of antibiotics and improve the financial returns and animal welfare.","PeriodicalId":147546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Research","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2576-6457.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bovine Respiratory Disease is the most frequent cause of disease and the main cause of death in cattle, which results in financial losses. The aim of this article is to present the prevalence of the different bacteria involved in Bovine Respiratory Disease in animals with respiratory symptoms in the Iberian Peninsula. Information was collected from a private laboratory, selecting the data from the analyses of the bovine respiratory disease panel performed between January 2017 and January 2020, which included the major respiratory pathogens. Samples originated from all across Spain (mostly from the North and Northeast) and Portugal. The type of sample was classified into four groups: organs, bronchoalveolar lavage, nasal and tracheal swabs. A farm was considered positive if at least one of the tests performed was positive to either real time qPCR or culture. Four hundred and fourty-eight reports were created representing 370 cattle farms with animals that showed respiratory symptoms. The observed prevalence of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis in the period examined was 32.8% (95% CI: 28.5%-37.2%), 55.6% (95% CI: 51.0%-60.2%), 24.1% (95% CI: 20.2%-28.1%), and 53.6% (95% CI: 49.0%-58.2%), respectively. Regarding the age of the animals in the reports examined, 7.4% (33) were samples from adult animals (beef or dairy cattle), 51.3% (230) were from fattening calves (feedlots), and 23.2% (104) were from veal calves. The age group or production system was not identifiable in 18.1% (81) of the remaining reports. As for the types of samples, the majority (58.5%) were organs from animals suffering from Bovine Respiratory Disease (lungs), followed by bronchoalveolar lavage (29.7%), nasal swabs (6.5%), and tracheal swabs (1.6%). In 3.8% of cases, the farms sent various types of sample together. In 88.3% of cases where a virus was detected, bacteria were also found. On the other hand, in 45.3% of all the reports, the only agents detected were bacteria. Bacteria were involved in at least 77.2% of outbreaks. These results confirm the need for preventing bacterial pneumonia to reduce the use of antibiotics and improve the financial returns and animal welfare.
牛呼吸道疾病复合体:伊比利亚半岛涉及肺炎的不同细菌的流行
牛呼吸道疾病是最常见的疾病原因,也是导致牛死亡的主要原因,造成经济损失。本文的目的是介绍在伊比利亚半岛有呼吸道症状的动物中涉及牛呼吸道疾病的不同细菌的流行情况。信息是从一个私人实验室收集的,从2017年1月至2020年1月期间对牛呼吸道疾病小组进行的分析中选择数据,其中包括主要的呼吸道病原体。样本来自西班牙各地(主要来自北部和东北部)和葡萄牙。样本类型分为四组:脏器、支气管肺泡灌洗、鼻拭子和气管拭子。如果至少有一项测试对实时qPCR或培养呈阳性,则认为该农场呈阳性。共创建了448份报告,涉及370个牛场,这些牛场的动物出现了呼吸道症状。调查期间溶血性血友病、多杀性巴氏杆菌、嗜睡组织菌和牛支原体的患病率分别为32.8% (95% CI: 28.5% ~ 37.2%)、55.6% (95% CI: 51.0% ~ 60.2%)、24.1% (95% CI: 20.2% ~ 28.1%)和53.6% (95% CI: 49.0% ~ 58.2%)。关于报告中动物的年龄,7.4%(33只)来自成年动物(牛肉或奶牛),51.3%(230只)来自育肥小牛(饲养场),23.2%(104只)来自小牛肉。18.1%(81例)的剩余报告无法确定年龄组或生产系统。从样本类型来看,大多数(58.5%)是牛呼吸道疾病动物的器官(肺),其次是支气管肺泡灌洗(29.7%)、鼻拭子(6.5%)和气管拭子(1.6%)。在3.8%的案例中,农场将各种类型的样本一起发送。在检测到病毒的病例中,88.3%还发现了细菌。另一方面,45.3%的报告中,唯一检测到的病原体是细菌。至少77.2%的暴发与细菌有关。这些结果证实了预防细菌性肺炎的必要性,以减少抗生素的使用,提高经济回报和动物福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信