استخدام العمل بمبدأ الاحتياط في مسائل البيوع والوكالة: دراسة فقهية تحليلة مقارنة

I. Khan, Usama Ahmed, Ahmed Abdullah
{"title":"استخدام العمل بمبدأ الاحتياط في مسائل البيوع والوكالة: دراسة فقهية تحليلة مقارنة","authors":"I. Khan, Usama Ahmed, Ahmed Abdullah","doi":"10.51665/al-duhaa.003.01.0155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All the Jurists school of thoughts accept the principal of precaution. But there are many examples in Islamic jurisprudence that show when some jurists used this principle in some matters, so other jurists left this principle in the same applications. So the question is that which are the examples on base of precaution principal according to Ḥanī Jurists in the chapter of Al- baywūʿ and in the chapter of Al-wakālah? And the second question is that have the other jurists adopted this principle or they left it in the same application? There are third question is that if they did not adopt this principal in these application, so what are their arguments against precaution principal in these application?  As for this paper it describes some applications on the base of precaution principal in the chapter of Al-baywūʿ and in the chapter of Al-wakālah adopting comparative, analytical And Jurisprudence methodology. So it describes other jurist’s opinions who left this principal in these applications. Furthermore, it makes comparison in these two opposites opinions in these applications to find the true positions of this principal in Islamic jurisprudence. It concludes that there three examples on the base of precaution principal. It also concludes that the some other jurists left this principal in these applications, but this paper finds that the adaptation of precaution principal in these applications is correct according to Sharīʿah point of view. So after studying this paper we will be able to us this principal in contemporary jurisprudence matters after knowing its true shape in Islamic jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":134412,"journal":{"name":"Al-Duhaa","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Duhaa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51665/al-duhaa.003.01.0155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All the Jurists school of thoughts accept the principal of precaution. But there are many examples in Islamic jurisprudence that show when some jurists used this principle in some matters, so other jurists left this principle in the same applications. So the question is that which are the examples on base of precaution principal according to Ḥanī Jurists in the chapter of Al- baywūʿ and in the chapter of Al-wakālah? And the second question is that have the other jurists adopted this principle or they left it in the same application? There are third question is that if they did not adopt this principal in these application, so what are their arguments against precaution principal in these application?  As for this paper it describes some applications on the base of precaution principal in the chapter of Al-baywūʿ and in the chapter of Al-wakālah adopting comparative, analytical And Jurisprudence methodology. So it describes other jurist’s opinions who left this principal in these applications. Furthermore, it makes comparison in these two opposites opinions in these applications to find the true positions of this principal in Islamic jurisprudence. It concludes that there three examples on the base of precaution principal. It also concludes that the some other jurists left this principal in these applications, but this paper finds that the adaptation of precaution principal in these applications is correct according to Sharīʿah point of view. So after studying this paper we will be able to us this principal in contemporary jurisprudence matters after knowing its true shape in Islamic jurisprudence.
在销售和原子能机构事项中采用预防原则:比较理论研究
所有法学家的思想流派都接受预防原则。但是在伊斯兰法理学中有很多例子表明,当一些法学家在某些事情上使用这一原则时,其他法学家在同样的应用中留下了这一原则。那么问题是,根据Ḥanī法学家在Al- baywyahu一章和Al-wakālah一章中提出的预防原则的例子是什么?第二个问题是其他法学家是采纳了这一原则还是在同样的应用中保留了这一原则?第三个问题是,如果他们在这些申请中没有采用这一原则,那么他们在这些申请中反对预防原则的理由是什么?本文采用比较法、分析法和法理学的方法,分别在al - baywyal和Al-wakālah两章阐述了在预防原则基础上的一些应用。所以它描述了其他法学家的观点他们在这些申请中留下了这个原则。此外,在这些应用中对这两种相反的观点进行比较,以找到这一原则在伊斯兰法学中的真实地位。在预防原则的基础上,总结出三个实例。其他法学家在这些适用中也保留了这一原则,但本文认为,从沙尔尼的观点来看,预防原则在这些适用中的适用是正确的。因此,通过本文的研究,我们将能够在了解这一原则在伊斯兰法学中的真实形态后,对其在当代法理学问题中的作用有所了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信