COUNTERING RAIDING: WORLD EXPERIENCE

B. Khamitov
{"title":"COUNTERING RAIDING: WORLD EXPERIENCE","authors":"B. Khamitov","doi":"10.51788/tsul.rols.2021.5.4./obwp5514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the conditions of the modern market economy in Kazakhstan, criminal elements actively practice the use of the mechanism of raider seizures of firms and enterprises. The measures taken by the state to counter raiding do not bring proper results, as a result, its negative consequences affect the pace of economic development and security of the country. The purpose of this study is to identify, generalize and analyze the theoretical and practical aspects of countering raiding, taking into account world experience, as well as to develop scientifically sound recommendations for improving the effectiveness of criminal law and criminological measures. The subject of the study is foreign legislation regulating the processes of mergers and acquisitions, as well as mechanisms for countering crimes committed during the implementation of these processes. The objectives of the research are: to study foreign experience in the field of countering raiding and to develop an effective mechanism for protecting business from raider seizures. Methodological basis of the research: The use of general scientific methods of cognition: comparative legal. The article analyzes the experience of economically developed countries of the world in countering raiding, methods and methods of seizure, including counteraction measures, as well as the possibility of its transformation into national legislation. With the development of technologies and the increase in the effectiveness of anti-raiding measures, schemes and types of raiding are changing. In this connection, the mechanisms of transition from a hostile takeover to a friendly one are considered. The theoretical study of the world experience of countering raiding and the generalizations and conclusions made at the same time not only prove the value of the accumulated experience, but also provide an opportunity to develop their own model of counteraction. In addition, the problem of criminal liability for raiding is considered, the legislation on the covered issue is analyzed, where the author expresses his own point of view on this issue. Insufficient research on this topic in Kazakhstan determines its relevance.","PeriodicalId":102464,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law Sciences","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.rols.2021.5.4./obwp5514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the conditions of the modern market economy in Kazakhstan, criminal elements actively practice the use of the mechanism of raider seizures of firms and enterprises. The measures taken by the state to counter raiding do not bring proper results, as a result, its negative consequences affect the pace of economic development and security of the country. The purpose of this study is to identify, generalize and analyze the theoretical and practical aspects of countering raiding, taking into account world experience, as well as to develop scientifically sound recommendations for improving the effectiveness of criminal law and criminological measures. The subject of the study is foreign legislation regulating the processes of mergers and acquisitions, as well as mechanisms for countering crimes committed during the implementation of these processes. The objectives of the research are: to study foreign experience in the field of countering raiding and to develop an effective mechanism for protecting business from raider seizures. Methodological basis of the research: The use of general scientific methods of cognition: comparative legal. The article analyzes the experience of economically developed countries of the world in countering raiding, methods and methods of seizure, including counteraction measures, as well as the possibility of its transformation into national legislation. With the development of technologies and the increase in the effectiveness of anti-raiding measures, schemes and types of raiding are changing. In this connection, the mechanisms of transition from a hostile takeover to a friendly one are considered. The theoretical study of the world experience of countering raiding and the generalizations and conclusions made at the same time not only prove the value of the accumulated experience, but also provide an opportunity to develop their own model of counteraction. In addition, the problem of criminal liability for raiding is considered, the legislation on the covered issue is analyzed, where the author expresses his own point of view on this issue. Insufficient research on this topic in Kazakhstan determines its relevance.
反突袭:世界经验
在哈萨克斯坦现代市场经济条件下,犯罪分子积极运用突击查封机制。国家采取的打击突袭的措施没有带来应有的效果,其负面后果影响了国家经济发展的步伐和安全。本研究的目的是在考虑到世界经验的情况下,确定、概括和分析打击突袭的理论和实践方面,并为提高刑法和犯罪学措施的有效性提出科学合理的建议。这项研究的主题是管制合并和收购过程的外国立法,以及打击在执行这些过程中所犯罪行的机制。研究的目的是:借鉴国外在打击突击搜查方面的经验,建立一种有效的保护企业免受突击搜查的机制。研究的方法论基础:运用一般科学的认知方法:比较法学。文章分析了世界经济发达国家打击偷袭的经验、查封的方法和方法,包括反制措施,以及将其转化为国家立法的可能性。随着技术的发展和防突袭措施有效性的提高,突袭的方案和类型也在不断变化。在这方面,考虑了从敌意收购到友好收购的过渡机制。通过对世界反盗猎经验的理论研究,同时进行归纳和总结,不仅证明了经验积累的价值,也为发展自己的反盗猎模式提供了契机。此外,本文还对抢劫犯罪的刑事责任问题进行了思考,并对该问题的立法进行了分析,并就该问题发表了自己的看法。哈萨克斯坦对这一专题的研究不足决定了其相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信