Tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity of the situation and anxiety as a state and as a feature

Sylwia Bokuniewicz
{"title":"Tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity of the situation and anxiety as a state and as a feature","authors":"Sylwia Bokuniewicz","doi":"10.15503/jecs2020.2.224.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of the undertaken research is to explain to what extent the tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity of the situation is associated with anxiety as a state and with anxiety as a trait. \nMethods. The survey was conducted in electronic form with the aid of a form created on the Profitest.pl platform. The Uncertainty Tolerance Scale (own translation), COPE, STAI and Ambiguity tolerance scale were used. The examined variables were: coping with stress, feeling of anxiety as a state and anxiety as a trait (explained variables); uncertainty tolerance and ambiguity tolerance (explanatory variables). \nResults and conclusion. The research shows that people who feel anxious in uncertainty situations can absorb it and start using it as a trait. It was also noted that the greater the tolerance of uncertainty they have to reply to, the worse they cope in critical ambiguity situations. It has also been found that in order to overcome discomfort in difficult situations, people use equal coping strategies. Greater ambiguity tolerance allows participants to experience less stress. On the other hand, the lower the tolerance, the more often they reach for emotional and instrumental support and focus on emotions. \nOriginality. Understanding the mediating processes related to the studied phenomenon may be of fundamental importance in the development of support systems promoting the improvement of mental functioning of people who have problems with quick adaptation to changes and in the creation of appropriate prevention programs aimed at helping these people.","PeriodicalId":256704,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.224.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the undertaken research is to explain to what extent the tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity of the situation is associated with anxiety as a state and with anxiety as a trait. Methods. The survey was conducted in electronic form with the aid of a form created on the Profitest.pl platform. The Uncertainty Tolerance Scale (own translation), COPE, STAI and Ambiguity tolerance scale were used. The examined variables were: coping with stress, feeling of anxiety as a state and anxiety as a trait (explained variables); uncertainty tolerance and ambiguity tolerance (explanatory variables). Results and conclusion. The research shows that people who feel anxious in uncertainty situations can absorb it and start using it as a trait. It was also noted that the greater the tolerance of uncertainty they have to reply to, the worse they cope in critical ambiguity situations. It has also been found that in order to overcome discomfort in difficult situations, people use equal coping strategies. Greater ambiguity tolerance allows participants to experience less stress. On the other hand, the lower the tolerance, the more often they reach for emotional and instrumental support and focus on emotions. Originality. Understanding the mediating processes related to the studied phenomenon may be of fundamental importance in the development of support systems promoting the improvement of mental functioning of people who have problems with quick adaptation to changes and in the creation of appropriate prevention programs aimed at helping these people.
容忍不确定性和模棱两可的情况和焦虑作为一种状态和特征
的目标。这项研究的目的是解释对不确定性和模糊性的容忍在多大程度上与焦虑作为一种状态和焦虑作为一种特质相关联。方法。该调查是通过Profitest.pl平台上创建的表格以电子形式进行的。采用不确定性容差量表(自己翻译)、COPE、STAI和歧义容差量表。检查的变量是:应对压力,焦虑的感觉作为一种状态和焦虑作为一种特征(解释变量);不确定性容忍和模糊性容忍(解释变量)。结果与结论。研究表明,在不确定的情况下感到焦虑的人可以吸收它,并开始把它作为一种特质。还有人指出,他们对不确定性的容忍度越高,他们在关键的不明确情况下的应付能力就越差。研究还发现,为了克服困难情况下的不适,人们使用平等的应对策略。更大的歧义容忍度可以让参与者感受到更少的压力。另一方面,容忍度越低,他们就越经常寻求情感和工具支持,并关注情感。创意。理解与所研究现象相关的调节过程可能对支持系统的发展具有根本的重要性,这些支持系统可以促进那些对变化有快速适应问题的人的心理功能的改善,并有助于创建旨在帮助这些人的适当预防计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信