{"title":"A Critical Capability Approach to Evaluate Open Development","authors":"Yingquin Zheng, B. Stahl, B. Faith","doi":"10.7551/MITPRESS/11480.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of open development has evolved over time. Smith et al. (2008) presented Open ICT4D as a working hypothesis that refers to the use of new ICTs to engage in open processes to achieve development gains. It is underlined by a set of principles that privilege universal access, participation, and collaboration over restricted access and centralized production (Smith and Elder 2010). Stemming from ICT4D roots, the openness of concern in this context is considered to be digitally or informationnetwork enabled. Open development refers not only to the technological infrastructure that supports openness but also more importantly to the processes that enhance sharing, collaboration, social inclusion, accountability, and transparency. In recent years, open movements have spread across many sectors, including open data, open government, open educational resources, open science, and open development, and standards for openness have been adopted in many of these sectors. In June 2013, the European Union adopted an updated directive aimed at facilitating the reuse of public sector information by businesses, creative citizens, developers, and others (European Commission 2013). At the same time, the G8 countries signed the Open Data Charter, built around five principles: open data by default, high quality and quantity, usable by all, release data for improved governance, and release data for innovation (Susha et al. 2014). This in itself could be seen as demonstrating the importance of digitally enabled openness to a range of international and national political entities both in middleincome countries and in the Global North. In many cases, openness is being promoted by institutional players such as international organizations, national and local governments, and nongovernmental organizations. 9 A Critical Capability Approach to Evaluate Open Development","PeriodicalId":133444,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Open Development","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on Open Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/11480.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of open development has evolved over time. Smith et al. (2008) presented Open ICT4D as a working hypothesis that refers to the use of new ICTs to engage in open processes to achieve development gains. It is underlined by a set of principles that privilege universal access, participation, and collaboration over restricted access and centralized production (Smith and Elder 2010). Stemming from ICT4D roots, the openness of concern in this context is considered to be digitally or informationnetwork enabled. Open development refers not only to the technological infrastructure that supports openness but also more importantly to the processes that enhance sharing, collaboration, social inclusion, accountability, and transparency. In recent years, open movements have spread across many sectors, including open data, open government, open educational resources, open science, and open development, and standards for openness have been adopted in many of these sectors. In June 2013, the European Union adopted an updated directive aimed at facilitating the reuse of public sector information by businesses, creative citizens, developers, and others (European Commission 2013). At the same time, the G8 countries signed the Open Data Charter, built around five principles: open data by default, high quality and quantity, usable by all, release data for improved governance, and release data for innovation (Susha et al. 2014). This in itself could be seen as demonstrating the importance of digitally enabled openness to a range of international and national political entities both in middleincome countries and in the Global North. In many cases, openness is being promoted by institutional players such as international organizations, national and local governments, and nongovernmental organizations. 9 A Critical Capability Approach to Evaluate Open Development
开放发展的理念是长期形成的。Smith等人(2008)提出了开放ICT4D作为一个工作假设,指的是使用新的ict参与开放流程以实现发展收益。它强调了一系列原则,即普遍访问、参与和协作优于限制访问和集中生产(Smith and Elder 2010)。基于ICT4D的根源,在此背景下关注的开放性被认为是数字化或信息网络。开放发展不仅指支持开放的技术基础设施,更重要的是指加强共享、协作、社会包容、问责制和透明度的进程。近年来,开放运动在数据开放、政府开放、教育资源开放、科学开放、发展开放等领域广泛开展,并在许多领域确立了开放标准。2013年6月,欧盟通过了一项更新的指令,旨在促进企业、有创造力的公民、开发者和其他人对公共部门信息的再利用(欧盟委员会2013)。与此同时,八国集团国家签署了《开放数据宪章》,该宪章围绕五项原则建立:默认开放数据、高质量和高数量开放数据、所有人都可以使用、为改善治理而发布数据、为创新而发布数据(Susha et al. 2014)。这本身就可以被视为对中等收入国家和全球北方的一系列国际和国家政治实体进行数字化开放的重要性。在许多情况下,开放是由国际组织、国家和地方政府以及非政府组织等机构参与者推动的。评估开放式开发的关键能力方法