THE ROLE OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE AND STRESS COPING STRATEGIES AS INDICATORS OF READINESS TO EXECUTE TASKS IN CRISIS SITUATIONS AMONG POLICE OFFICERS, NATIONAL FIRE SERVICE MEMBERS AND MILITARY CAREER OFFICERS

L. Borowicz, M. Sokolowski
{"title":"THE ROLE OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE AND STRESS COPING STRATEGIES AS INDICATORS OF READINESS TO EXECUTE TASKS IN CRISIS SITUATIONS AMONG POLICE OFFICERS, NATIONAL FIRE SERVICE MEMBERS AND MILITARY CAREER OFFICERS","authors":"L. Borowicz, M. Sokolowski","doi":"10.5604/17318157.1200159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main factors connected with the effectiveness of realizing tasks in crisis situations is the psycho-physiological condition of the team members. The specificity of tasks, which are carried out during crisis management, imposes the risk of functioning under pressure. Crisis response teams can counteract or foster the development of a crisis situation if the tasks are delayed or performed incorrectly. The aim of the article is to examine stress coping strategies and the sense of coherence in army, police, and fire brigade adepts. The level of the sense of coherence was assessed using the SOC-29 questionnaire (Antonovsky, 1995), whereas stress coping strategies were measured using the CISS questionnaire (Endler & Parker, 1990). The results revealed no significant differences between the representatives of the three formations in their sense of coherence or stress coping strategies. Statistical differences between the groups were noted for the following subscales: avoidance strategy, engagement in substitutionary tasks, and searching for social contact. There were no significant correlations between the total and subscale scores of the measures.","PeriodicalId":233227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science of the Gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/17318157.1200159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main factors connected with the effectiveness of realizing tasks in crisis situations is the psycho-physiological condition of the team members. The specificity of tasks, which are carried out during crisis management, imposes the risk of functioning under pressure. Crisis response teams can counteract or foster the development of a crisis situation if the tasks are delayed or performed incorrectly. The aim of the article is to examine stress coping strategies and the sense of coherence in army, police, and fire brigade adepts. The level of the sense of coherence was assessed using the SOC-29 questionnaire (Antonovsky, 1995), whereas stress coping strategies were measured using the CISS questionnaire (Endler & Parker, 1990). The results revealed no significant differences between the representatives of the three formations in their sense of coherence or stress coping strategies. Statistical differences between the groups were noted for the following subscales: avoidance strategy, engagement in substitutionary tasks, and searching for social contact. There were no significant correlations between the total and subscale scores of the measures.
警察、国家消防人员和军事职业军官作为在危机情况下执行任务的准备情况指标的一致性和应付压力战略的作用
在危机情境中,影响任务实现有效性的主要因素之一是团队成员的心理生理状况。在危机管理期间执行的任务的特殊性造成了在压力下运作的风险。如果任务被延迟或执行不正确,危机响应团队可以抵消或促进危机情况的发展。本文的目的是检查压力应对策略和连贯感在军队,警察和消防队的行家。使用SOC-29问卷(Antonovsky, 1995)评估一致性水平,而使用CISS问卷(Endler & Parker, 1990)测量压力应对策略。结果显示,三种群体的代表在一致性意识和压力应对策略上没有显著差异。两组之间的统计差异主要体现在以下几个子量表上:回避策略、参与替代任务和寻找社会联系。测量的总得分和分量量表得分之间没有显著的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信