Calidad educativa y educación ambiental en universidades de Huancayo

Eusebio Castro León
{"title":"Calidad educativa y educación ambiental en universidades de Huancayo","authors":"Eusebio Castro León","doi":"10.18259/acs.2016026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to evaluate the educational quality and contrast with environmental education in the Universidad Nacional del Centro del Peru (UNCP) and the Universidad Peruana Los Andes (UPLA) in Huancayo. The type of research was applied, descriptive level, non-experimental, transversal, and correlational design. The sample applied in the UNCP was 1052, with a self-weighting of 1020, and in the UPLA 950, with a self-weighting of 951. Regarding the techniques for data collection in both variables was the survey, and as instrument was used the questionnaire, which was subjected to the Cronbach Alpha reliability test. The results regarding educational quality in each guideline show that educational resources and infrastructure have the highest index of discrepancies and that the guideline of intellectual contribution, image and internationalization is the one with the lowest index of discrepancies; in relation to environmental education, the percentage of discrepancy is higher than the favorable opinion percentage; in relation to the variable educational quality and environmental education have the highest number of relationships found. In conclusion, both universities would not be providing educational quality; in addition, there is no commitment to environmental education and, above all, to the protection of the environment, demonstrating that both variables are related to each other, which at least suggests that there is a common factor that induces them.","PeriodicalId":142979,"journal":{"name":"Apuntes de Ciencia & Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apuntes de Ciencia & Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18259/acs.2016026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the educational quality and contrast with environmental education in the Universidad Nacional del Centro del Peru (UNCP) and the Universidad Peruana Los Andes (UPLA) in Huancayo. The type of research was applied, descriptive level, non-experimental, transversal, and correlational design. The sample applied in the UNCP was 1052, with a self-weighting of 1020, and in the UPLA 950, with a self-weighting of 951. Regarding the techniques for data collection in both variables was the survey, and as instrument was used the questionnaire, which was subjected to the Cronbach Alpha reliability test. The results regarding educational quality in each guideline show that educational resources and infrastructure have the highest index of discrepancies and that the guideline of intellectual contribution, image and internationalization is the one with the lowest index of discrepancies; in relation to environmental education, the percentage of discrepancy is higher than the favorable opinion percentage; in relation to the variable educational quality and environmental education have the highest number of relationships found. In conclusion, both universities would not be providing educational quality; in addition, there is no commitment to environmental education and, above all, to the protection of the environment, demonstrating that both variables are related to each other, which at least suggests that there is a common factor that induces them.
万卡约大学的教育质量和环境教育
目的是评价秘鲁国立中央大学(UNCP)和万卡约的秘鲁洛斯安第斯大学(UPLA)的教育质量并与环境教育进行比较。研究类型为应用型、描述性、非实验性、横向和相关设计。应用于UNCP的样本为1052,自权重为1020;应用于UPLA的样本为950,自权重为951。关于数据收集的技术在两个变量是调查,并作为工具使用问卷,这是经过Cronbach Alpha信度检验。各指标中教育质量差异指数最高的是教育资源和基础设施指标,差异指数最低的是智力贡献、形象和国际化指标;在环境教育方面,持反对意见的比例高于持赞成意见的比例;在相关变量中,教育质量与环境教育的关系发现的数量最多。总之,两所大学都无法提供高质量的教育;此外,没有对环境教育,尤其是对环境保护作出承诺,这表明这两个变量是相互关联的,这至少表明有一个共同的因素导致了它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信