Meta-Evaluation of a Context-Aware Mobile Device Usability

F. Jambon, C. Golanski, Pascal Pommier
{"title":"Meta-Evaluation of a Context-Aware Mobile Device Usability","authors":"F. Jambon, C. Golanski, Pascal Pommier","doi":"10.1109/UBICOMM.2007.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the completeness and the correctness of usability analyses conducted in usability laboratories compared to analyses conducted in reality testing (where the context is real and video recordings impossible for technical or privacy reasons). To do so, we set up a meta-evaluation of a mobile device in a quasi-realistic context. We collected two sets of data. The first type refers to data usually available in a classic usability laboratory, the second simulates data which could be collected in reality testing. We did two independent analyses and then, afterward, compared their findings. The meta- evaluation concludes that it is possible -with limitations- to evaluate the usability of a mobile device in reality testing without video recordings. However, the usability problems detected may remain unexplained without the help of the video recordings.","PeriodicalId":305315,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies (UBICOMM'07)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies (UBICOMM'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UBICOMM.2007.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article analyzes the completeness and the correctness of usability analyses conducted in usability laboratories compared to analyses conducted in reality testing (where the context is real and video recordings impossible for technical or privacy reasons). To do so, we set up a meta-evaluation of a mobile device in a quasi-realistic context. We collected two sets of data. The first type refers to data usually available in a classic usability laboratory, the second simulates data which could be collected in reality testing. We did two independent analyses and then, afterward, compared their findings. The meta- evaluation concludes that it is possible -with limitations- to evaluate the usability of a mobile device in reality testing without video recordings. However, the usability problems detected may remain unexplained without the help of the video recordings.
情境感知移动设备可用性的元评估
本文分析了在可用性实验室中进行的可用性分析的完整性和正确性,并与在现实测试中进行的分析进行了比较(在现实测试中,上下文是真实的,由于技术或隐私原因无法录制视频)。为此,我们在准现实环境中对移动设备进行了元评估。我们收集了两组数据。第一种类型是指通常在经典可用性实验室中可用的数据,第二种类型是模拟可以在现实测试中收集到的数据。我们做了两个独立的分析,然后比较了他们的发现。元评估的结论是,在没有视频记录的情况下,在现实测试中评估移动设备的可用性是可能的,但存在局限性。但是,如果没有视频记录的帮助,检测到的可用性问题可能仍然无法解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信