Strategic Properties of Peer-to-Peer Data Structures and Behaviour of Human Peers in Economic Experiments

Stephan Schosser, Klemens Böhm, R. Schmidt, B. Vogt
{"title":"Strategic Properties of Peer-to-Peer Data Structures and Behaviour of Human Peers in Economic Experiments","authors":"Stephan Schosser, Klemens Böhm, R. Schmidt, B. Vogt","doi":"10.1109/ICDEW.2006.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structured peer-to-peer networks manage large data sets. Each peer administers a part of the data. To answer a query, several peers must collaborate. However, experience with peer-to-peer file sharing systems shows that peers tend to abandon collaboration. Such behaviour is also expected in structured peer-to-peer systems. In the recent past, protocols for such systems to counter this kind of behaviour have been proposed. Our objective is to investigate how the behaviour of peers reacts to such protocols. We use idealized game theoretic models to analyze the strategic properties of structured peer-to-peer networks. The models predict cutoff strategies. I.e., if more than a certain percentage of their queries are answered, peers also answer queries in a stationary equilibrium. Another theoretical result is that free riding may occur in equilibrium. To check whether our theoretical predictions are in line with reality, we have implemented our model in an experimental laboratory and have analyzed the behaviour of human peers. These experiments support our theoretical results.","PeriodicalId":331953,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2006.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Structured peer-to-peer networks manage large data sets. Each peer administers a part of the data. To answer a query, several peers must collaborate. However, experience with peer-to-peer file sharing systems shows that peers tend to abandon collaboration. Such behaviour is also expected in structured peer-to-peer systems. In the recent past, protocols for such systems to counter this kind of behaviour have been proposed. Our objective is to investigate how the behaviour of peers reacts to such protocols. We use idealized game theoretic models to analyze the strategic properties of structured peer-to-peer networks. The models predict cutoff strategies. I.e., if more than a certain percentage of their queries are answered, peers also answer queries in a stationary equilibrium. Another theoretical result is that free riding may occur in equilibrium. To check whether our theoretical predictions are in line with reality, we have implemented our model in an experimental laboratory and have analyzed the behaviour of human peers. These experiments support our theoretical results.
经济实验中点对点数据结构的策略属性和人类同伴的行为
结构化点对点网络管理大型数据集。每个对等体管理数据的一部分。要回答一个查询,几个对等体必须协作。然而,点对点文件共享系统的经验表明,点对点倾向于放弃协作。这种行为在结构化的点对点系统中也是可以预见的。在最近的过去,已经提出了这种系统的协议来对抗这种行为。我们的目标是研究对等体的行为如何对此类协议作出反应。我们使用理想的博弈论模型来分析结构化点对点网络的策略特性。这些模型预测截止策略。也就是说,如果超过一定比例的查询得到了回答,对等节点也会以平稳均衡的方式回答查询。另一个理论结果是,搭便车可能在均衡状态下发生。为了检验我们的理论预测是否与现实相符,我们在实验实验室中实施了我们的模型,并分析了人类同伴的行为。这些实验支持了我们的理论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信