{"title":"Classification of Erythematosquamous Dermatosis by the Method of Random Forest","authors":"Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Dwaiypayan Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine Learning (ML) methods have found wide applications in dermatology (Chan et al., 2020) [1]. Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther (2020) reviewed 2175 publications and found that the most common usage of ML methods was in the binary classification of malignant melanoma from images [2]. Adamson and Smith have a word of advice about usage of ML methods in diagnosis of skin diseases that inclusivity must be kept in mind for classification results to be accurate [3]. Steele et al. searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and found that the performance of ML methods was variable, and overall accuracy measure was not a good measure for sub-group accuracy [4].","PeriodicalId":203275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews & Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdmrs/2023(4)143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) methods have found wide applications in dermatology (Chan et al., 2020) [1]. Thomsen, Iversen, Titlestad & Winther (2020) reviewed 2175 publications and found that the most common usage of ML methods was in the binary classification of malignant melanoma from images [2]. Adamson and Smith have a word of advice about usage of ML methods in diagnosis of skin diseases that inclusivity must be kept in mind for classification results to be accurate [3]. Steele et al. searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL, and found that the performance of ML methods was variable, and overall accuracy measure was not a good measure for sub-group accuracy [4].