Contrast Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Versus Contrast Enhanced T1-Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Infectious Meningitis

Husham H Abdul-Ra'aoof, Mohammed Al-Khalissi
{"title":"Contrast Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Versus Contrast Enhanced T1-Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Infectious Meningitis","authors":"Husham H Abdul-Ra'aoof, Mohammed Al-Khalissi","doi":"10.37319/iqnjm.4.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background                                                                                                                                        \nInfectious meningitis is an infection of the subarachnoid space causing inflammation of the leptomeninges. Early diagnosis is crucial to initiate appropriate therapy, avoid complications, and improve prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis is important in the diagnosis and is done by performing lumbar puncture with some limitations and complications. MRI plays a role in the diagnosis by depicting abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement.\nAim of the study \nTo evaluate the efficiency of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery compared with contrast-enhanced T1 spin echo in the diagnosis of infectious meningitis.\nPatients and Methods \nA prospective analytical study of diagnostic tests was conducted. Brain MRI was done using a 3-Tesla system. Gadolinium was used as contrast material. The final diagnosis of meningitis was made based on cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Validity parameters, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy for both sequences were calculated and compared to each other. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed.\nResults\nFifty-six patients were involved (31 males and 25 females) in this study, and they ranged from 15 to 68 years in age. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was positive in 41 patients and negative in 15. Contrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery has higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy compared with contrast enhanced–T1 spin echo. The mean net meningeal enhancement is significantly higher in contrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery. Substantial interobserver agreement between the two sequences was observed.\nConclusion\nContrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery is superior to contrast enhanced–T1 spin echo in the diagnosis of infectious meningitis.\n.\n \n ","PeriodicalId":333401,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi National journal of Medicine","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi National journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37319/iqnjm.4.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background                                                                                                                                         Infectious meningitis is an infection of the subarachnoid space causing inflammation of the leptomeninges. Early diagnosis is crucial to initiate appropriate therapy, avoid complications, and improve prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis is important in the diagnosis and is done by performing lumbar puncture with some limitations and complications. MRI plays a role in the diagnosis by depicting abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement. Aim of the study To evaluate the efficiency of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery compared with contrast-enhanced T1 spin echo in the diagnosis of infectious meningitis. Patients and Methods A prospective analytical study of diagnostic tests was conducted. Brain MRI was done using a 3-Tesla system. Gadolinium was used as contrast material. The final diagnosis of meningitis was made based on cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Validity parameters, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy for both sequences were calculated and compared to each other. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed. Results Fifty-six patients were involved (31 males and 25 females) in this study, and they ranged from 15 to 68 years in age. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was positive in 41 patients and negative in 15. Contrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery has higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy compared with contrast enhanced–T1 spin echo. The mean net meningeal enhancement is significantly higher in contrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery. Substantial interobserver agreement between the two sequences was observed. Conclusion Contrast enhanced–fluid attenuated inversion recovery is superior to contrast enhanced–T1 spin echo in the diagnosis of infectious meningitis. .    
对比增强液体衰减反转恢复与增强t1 -自旋回波磁共振成像在评估感染性脑膜炎中的作用
背景                                                                                                                                          蛛网膜下腔的感染性脑膜炎是感染导致软脑膜的炎症。早期诊断对及时治疗、避免并发症、改善预后至关重要。脑脊液分析在诊断中很重要,通过腰椎穿刺进行,有一些局限性和并发症。MRI通过描绘异常的轻脑膜增强在诊断中发挥作用。目的探讨对比增强T1自旋回波与增强液体衰减反转恢复对感染性脑膜炎的诊断价值。患者和方法对诊断试验进行前瞻性分析研究。脑MRI采用3特斯拉系统。钆作为造影剂。最后诊断为脑膜炎是根据脑脊液分析。计算两个序列的有效性参数、预测值和诊断准确性,并相互比较。进行了定量和定性分析。结果本组共纳入56例患者,其中男31例,女25例,年龄15 ~ 68岁。脑脊液分析41例阳性,15例阴性。对比增强流体衰减反演恢复与对比增强t1自旋回波相比,具有更高的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。在对比增强-流体衰减反演恢复中,平均净脑膜增强明显更高。观察到两个序列之间存在实质性的观察者间一致性。结论对比剂增强液体衰减反转恢复在诊断感染性脑膜炎方面优于对比剂增强t1自旋回波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信