TRANSITIONS IN GLOBAL POLARITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S STRATEGY TOWARD SOUTH ASIA

A. Malik, M. N. Mirza, I. H. Qaisrani
{"title":"TRANSITIONS IN GLOBAL POLARITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S STRATEGY TOWARD SOUTH ASIA","authors":"A. Malik, M. N. Mirza, I. H. Qaisrani","doi":"10.18510/hssr.2020.84145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: This study intends to explore the discourses on patterns of systemic polarity. The study of these discourses helps in the development of the discipline of International Relations. The study also explores the foreign policy of the United States - being the greatest power of the time and claiming to be the custodian of the prevailing international order – towards South Asia. \nMethodology: This is a qualitative explanatory and exploratory study. The specific method utilized to conduct the study remains the discourse analysis. \nMain Findings: The study finds that international polarity is a continuous process of transition. These are a combination of systemic and sub-systemic actors and factors that contribute to this transition. \nApplications of this study: The study is useful for students and scholars of International Relations, Area Studies, Strategic Studies, and allied disciplines. It is equally useful for policy practitioners. \nNovelty/Originality of this study: The discourses on patterns of international polarity have contributed to the development of International Relations as a discipline. A significant debate on the discourses of international polarity has been the pattern of post-Cold War and Post-9/11 orders. While there has been a relatively dominant claim that this era overall shows evidence of unipolarity; there is an equally influential claim that the international order appears multipolar. There is however a need to address a primary question that demands an inquiry into the type of multipolarity in the post-Cold War and post-9/11 eras as it is assumed that the dynamics of international order and great power rivalries in this era are significantly different from the earlier patterns of international multipolarity. This inquiry is informed by focusing on the policies of great powers toward south Asia and the transforming geostrategic and economic relations between significant South Asian states.  ","PeriodicalId":415004,"journal":{"name":"Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.84145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study intends to explore the discourses on patterns of systemic polarity. The study of these discourses helps in the development of the discipline of International Relations. The study also explores the foreign policy of the United States - being the greatest power of the time and claiming to be the custodian of the prevailing international order – towards South Asia. Methodology: This is a qualitative explanatory and exploratory study. The specific method utilized to conduct the study remains the discourse analysis. Main Findings: The study finds that international polarity is a continuous process of transition. These are a combination of systemic and sub-systemic actors and factors that contribute to this transition. Applications of this study: The study is useful for students and scholars of International Relations, Area Studies, Strategic Studies, and allied disciplines. It is equally useful for policy practitioners. Novelty/Originality of this study: The discourses on patterns of international polarity have contributed to the development of International Relations as a discipline. A significant debate on the discourses of international polarity has been the pattern of post-Cold War and Post-9/11 orders. While there has been a relatively dominant claim that this era overall shows evidence of unipolarity; there is an equally influential claim that the international order appears multipolar. There is however a need to address a primary question that demands an inquiry into the type of multipolarity in the post-Cold War and post-9/11 eras as it is assumed that the dynamics of international order and great power rivalries in this era are significantly different from the earlier patterns of international multipolarity. This inquiry is informed by focusing on the policies of great powers toward south Asia and the transforming geostrategic and economic relations between significant South Asian states.  
全球两极的转变和美国对南亚的战略
研究目的:本研究旨在探讨系统极性模式的话语。对这些话语的研究有助于国际关系学科的发展。该研究还探讨了美国作为当时最强大的国家并声称是现行国际秩序的守护者对南亚的外交政策。研究方法:这是一项定性解释和探索性研究。进行研究的具体方法仍然是语篇分析。主要发现:研究发现,国际极性是一个持续的过渡过程。这些是促成这一转变的系统性和次级系统性行为者和因素的组合。本研究的应用:本研究对国际关系、区域研究、战略研究及相关学科的学生和学者有一定的参考价值。它对政策实践者同样有用。本研究的新颖性/原创性:关于国际两极格局的论述促进了国际关系学科的发展。关于国际极化的一个重要争论是后冷战和后9/11秩序的模式。虽然有一个相对占主导地位的说法,即这个时代总体上显示出单极的证据;还有一种同样有影响力的观点认为,国际秩序似乎是多极的。然而,有必要解决一个主要问题,即需要对后冷战和后9/11时代的多极化类型进行调查,因为人们认为,这个时代的国际秩序动态和大国竞争与早期的国际多极化模式有很大不同。这一调查是通过关注大国对南亚的政策以及重要南亚国家之间不断变化的地缘战略和经济关系来进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信