Co-production towards just urban transformation Two different ways in Budapest, Hungary and in Sassari, Italy

Zsófia Anna Ghira, V. Monno
{"title":"Co-production towards just urban transformation Two different ways in Budapest, Hungary and in Sassari, Italy","authors":"Zsófia Anna Ghira, V. Monno","doi":"10.47472/jznjbsjp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative participatory processes, such as co-production is based on the creativity and the inclusion of participants. It is able to transform social relations, and can have significant positive impacts on urban transformations, therefore it is supported by local governments. Although through co-production citizens can have significant impact on decision-making and transformation, on the other hand, scholars argue that state-initiated processes can be the motors of institutionalization of inequalities. Taking spatial justice and its theoretical background, our paper offers a critical perspective toward co-production, as deployed in urban planning and policies, by focusing on two cases from different cities. Within the case of Budapest an urban regeneration programme is introduced in the most deprived neighbourhood of the city. In the other case we study the programme Crossing Cultures (Intrecciare Culture) in Sassari, Italy, that is a co-productive initiative is aimed to revitalize the historical centre of the city. The paper answers how/if co-production can contribute to spatial justice, to the fair distribution of socially valued resources in different places. first from while the second Budapest, The common characteristics in the cases are the aim of the initiatives and the co-productive methodology used. In both cases the principal aim of the public body was to find solutions that can counteract the urban decay, create better living conditions, and relations between residents, institutions and the space. For that, co-productive method was used, involving grassroots organizations and NGOs. The research examines how/if co-production can contribute to spatial justice in different environments, moreover, reflects on the deficiencies of co-production in the light of spatial justice.","PeriodicalId":254023,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress","volume":"267 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47472/jznjbsjp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative participatory processes, such as co-production is based on the creativity and the inclusion of participants. It is able to transform social relations, and can have significant positive impacts on urban transformations, therefore it is supported by local governments. Although through co-production citizens can have significant impact on decision-making and transformation, on the other hand, scholars argue that state-initiated processes can be the motors of institutionalization of inequalities. Taking spatial justice and its theoretical background, our paper offers a critical perspective toward co-production, as deployed in urban planning and policies, by focusing on two cases from different cities. Within the case of Budapest an urban regeneration programme is introduced in the most deprived neighbourhood of the city. In the other case we study the programme Crossing Cultures (Intrecciare Culture) in Sassari, Italy, that is a co-productive initiative is aimed to revitalize the historical centre of the city. The paper answers how/if co-production can contribute to spatial justice, to the fair distribution of socially valued resources in different places. first from while the second Budapest, The common characteristics in the cases are the aim of the initiatives and the co-productive methodology used. In both cases the principal aim of the public body was to find solutions that can counteract the urban decay, create better living conditions, and relations between residents, institutions and the space. For that, co-productive method was used, involving grassroots organizations and NGOs. The research examines how/if co-production can contribute to spatial justice in different environments, moreover, reflects on the deficiencies of co-production in the light of spatial justice.
在匈牙利布达佩斯和意大利萨萨里,两种不同的方式共同制作城市转型
创新的参与性进程,如合作制作,是基于参与者的创造力和包容性。它能够改变社会关系,对城市转型有显著的积极影响,因此受到地方政府的支持。虽然通过合作生产,公民可以对决策和转型产生重大影响,但另一方面,学者们认为,国家发起的过程可能是不平等制度化的发动机。本文以空间正义及其理论背景为基础,通过两个不同城市的案例,为合作生产在城市规划和政策中的应用提供了一个批判性的视角。以布达佩斯为例,在城市最贫困的街区引入了城市再生方案。在另一个案例中,我们研究了意大利萨萨里的跨文化项目(interrecciare Culture),这是一项旨在振兴城市历史中心的合作倡议。本文回答了合作生产如何/是否可以促进空间正义,促进社会价值资源在不同地方的公平分配。第一个来自布达佩斯,第二个来自布达佩斯,这些案例的共同特点是倡议的目标和所使用的共同生产方法。在这两种情况下,公共机构的主要目标都是找到能够抵消城市衰败的解决方案,创造更好的生活条件,以及居民、机构和空间之间的关系。为此,我们采取了共同生产的方式,让基层组织和非政府组织参与进来。研究考察了在不同环境下,合拍片如何促进空间正义,并从空间正义的角度反思了合拍片的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信