Symbol security condition considered harmful

M. Schaefer
{"title":"Symbol security condition considered harmful","authors":"M. Schaefer","doi":"10.1109/SECPRI.1989.36275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author identifies. interprets, and examines the requirements in the Department of Defense trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TCSEC) for the application of formal methods to the system design. The requirements are placed in their historical context to trace their origin. The TCSEC is found to have eliminated some widely-accepted, and critical, security assurance and analysis processes from its trust requirements. It is concluded that despite the flaws and omissions that occur in the published TCSEC, formal design verification is still of some potential value. However, use should not be considered to be an end in itself and may be harmful if applied as such.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":126792,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1989 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy","volume":"73 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1989 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.1989.36275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The author identifies. interprets, and examines the requirements in the Department of Defense trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TCSEC) for the application of formal methods to the system design. The requirements are placed in their historical context to trace their origin. The TCSEC is found to have eliminated some widely-accepted, and critical, security assurance and analysis processes from its trust requirements. It is concluded that despite the flaws and omissions that occur in the published TCSEC, formal design verification is still of some potential value. However, use should not be considered to be an end in itself and may be harmful if applied as such.<>
符号安全状态被认为是有害的
作者指出。解释和检查国防部可信计算机系统评估标准(TCSEC)中的要求,以便将形式化方法应用于系统设计。这些需求被放置在它们的历史背景中,以追溯它们的起源。发现TCSEC从其信任要求中删除了一些被广泛接受的、关键的安全保证和分析过程。由此得出结论,尽管已发布的TCSEC存在缺陷和遗漏,但形式设计验证仍然具有一定的潜在价值。然而,使用本身不应被认为是目的,如果这样使用可能是有害的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信