PHENOMENOLOGICAL EPOCHE: PLACIDITY OR DESPAIR?

Mikhail A. Belousov
{"title":"PHENOMENOLOGICAL EPOCHE: PLACIDITY OR DESPAIR?","authors":"Mikhail A. Belousov","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-27-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the question of the mundane motivation and affective character of phenomenological epoche. An attempt is made to show that, despite the fact that the epoche is interpreted by Husserl as a methodical operation, suspending engagement with the world – the affective engagement with the world as well as the one, constituted by the naïve belief in the existence of the world – the phenomenological epoche, like the skeptical one, is inextricably linked to the pursuance of the certain affective state, namely the state of placidity, and is motivated by the mundane interests, which it, at the same time, sublates retroactively. Thereby, the epoche turns out to be the radical affective engagement with the world as such. The first section of the article shows that in the classical description of the epoche in § 31–32 of Ideas I the reasons Husserls gives for the epoche are not the theoretical, but the existential-practical ones. The epoche should enable those who practice it achieve total freedom towards the world. The author demonstrates that the freedom is nothing but the placidity in the phenomenological sense or the ataraxy. The second section explicates the way the epoche is tied to the natural engagement with the world. The epoche motivation cannot be reduced to the freedom, since the epoche, according to Husserl, can be performed only in relation to something that can undergo modalization, that is, to be given as that which is dubious, nonexistent, possible etc. Thus, the epoche is also motivated by the fact, that the world can undergo modalization. But the modalization presupposes the initial engagement with the word the epoche just suspends. Through the epoche the engagement is disclosed as the one which cannot be realized. Therefore, the affective nature of the epoche consists not only in the placidity, but also in the despair, which is forgoing the hope of realizing the mundane interests and sublates them in hindsight. In contrast to the natural experience the epoche as placidity and despair is true affective engagement with the world as world.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-27-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the question of the mundane motivation and affective character of phenomenological epoche. An attempt is made to show that, despite the fact that the epoche is interpreted by Husserl as a methodical operation, suspending engagement with the world – the affective engagement with the world as well as the one, constituted by the naïve belief in the existence of the world – the phenomenological epoche, like the skeptical one, is inextricably linked to the pursuance of the certain affective state, namely the state of placidity, and is motivated by the mundane interests, which it, at the same time, sublates retroactively. Thereby, the epoche turns out to be the radical affective engagement with the world as such. The first section of the article shows that in the classical description of the epoche in § 31–32 of Ideas I the reasons Husserls gives for the epoche are not the theoretical, but the existential-practical ones. The epoche should enable those who practice it achieve total freedom towards the world. The author demonstrates that the freedom is nothing but the placidity in the phenomenological sense or the ataraxy. The second section explicates the way the epoche is tied to the natural engagement with the world. The epoche motivation cannot be reduced to the freedom, since the epoche, according to Husserl, can be performed only in relation to something that can undergo modalization, that is, to be given as that which is dubious, nonexistent, possible etc. Thus, the epoche is also motivated by the fact, that the world can undergo modalization. But the modalization presupposes the initial engagement with the word the epoche just suspends. Through the epoche the engagement is disclosed as the one which cannot be realized. Therefore, the affective nature of the epoche consists not only in the placidity, but also in the despair, which is forgoing the hope of realizing the mundane interests and sublates them in hindsight. In contrast to the natural experience the epoche as placidity and despair is true affective engagement with the world as world.
现象学时代:平静还是绝望?
本文探讨现象学时代的世俗动机和情感特征问题。试图表明,尽管试图厘清是被胡塞尔有条不紊的运行,暂停与世界接触,情感与世界的接触,由天真的相信世界的存在——现象学厘清,喜欢怀疑,密不可分的追求一定的情感状态,即安静的状态,并出于世俗的利益,它,同时,可追溯地扬弃。因此,这个时代被证明是与世界的激进情感接触。本文第一节指出,在《理念1》第31-32节对时代的经典描述中,胡塞尔给出的时代的理由不是理论的,而是存在-实践的。这个时代应该使那些实践它的人获得对世界的完全自由。作者论证了自由不过是现象学意义上的平静或天界。第二部分阐述了这个时代是如何与世界自然接触联系在一起的。时代动机不能被简化为自由,因为根据胡塞尔的观点,时代只能在与一些可以经历形态化的东西的关系中被执行,也就是说,被给予是可疑的,不存在的,可能的等等。因此,这个时代也是由世界可以经历形态化这一事实所驱动的。但是,情态化预设了与这个词的最初接触,这个时代只是暂停了。通过这个时代,契约被揭示为无法实现的契约。因此,这个时代的情感本质不仅在于平静,还在于绝望,即放弃实现世俗利益的希望,事后扬弃世俗利益。与自然经验相比,时代的平静和绝望是与世界的真正情感接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信