Comparison of wafer-level spatial I/sub DDQ/ estimation methods: NNR versus NCR

S. Sabade, D. Walker
{"title":"Comparison of wafer-level spatial I/sub DDQ/ estimation methods: NNR versus NCR","authors":"S. Sabade, D. Walker","doi":"10.1109/DBT.2004.1408947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extending the useful life of I/sub DDQ/ test to deep submicron technologies has been a topic of interest in recent years. I/sub DDQ/ test loses its effectiveness as the signal to noise ratio degrades due to rising background current and fault-free I/sub DDQ/ variance. Defect detection using I/sub DDQ/ test requires separation of deterministic sources of variation from defective current. Several methods that use deterministic variation in I/sub DDQ/ at the wafer level for estimating fault-free I/sub DDQ/ of a chip are proposed. This paper compares two such methods: nearest neighbor residual (NNR) and neighbor current ratio (NCR). These methods are evaluated using industrial test data for a recent technology.","PeriodicalId":407554,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX1004)","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX1004)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DBT.2004.1408947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Extending the useful life of I/sub DDQ/ test to deep submicron technologies has been a topic of interest in recent years. I/sub DDQ/ test loses its effectiveness as the signal to noise ratio degrades due to rising background current and fault-free I/sub DDQ/ variance. Defect detection using I/sub DDQ/ test requires separation of deterministic sources of variation from defective current. Several methods that use deterministic variation in I/sub DDQ/ at the wafer level for estimating fault-free I/sub DDQ/ of a chip are proposed. This paper compares two such methods: nearest neighbor residual (NNR) and neighbor current ratio (NCR). These methods are evaluated using industrial test data for a recent technology.
晶圆级空间I/sub DDQ/估算方法的比较:NNR与NCR
将I/sub DDQ/测试的使用寿命延长到深亚微米技术是近年来人们感兴趣的话题。由于背景电流上升和无故障I/sub DDQ/方差,信噪比降低,I/sub DDQ/测试失去了有效性。使用I/sub DDQ/测试进行缺陷检测需要从缺陷电流中分离出确定的变化源。提出了几种利用晶圆级I/sub DDQ/的确定性变化来估计芯片无故障I/sub DDQ/的方法。本文比较了两种方法:最近邻残差法(NNR)和邻流比法(NCR)。这些方法是用最新技术的工业测试数据进行评估的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信