Can the Graduated Income Tax Survive Optimal Tax Analysis?

L. Zelenak, K. Moreland
{"title":"Can the Graduated Income Tax Survive Optimal Tax Analysis?","authors":"L. Zelenak, K. Moreland","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.163381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal tax analysis attempts to find the income tax rate structure which maximizes social welfare, under a chosen social welfare function (which can range from purely utilitarian to a Rawlsian maximin). It provides sophisticated mathematical techniques for balancing the welfare gains from redistribution against the welfare losses from the disincentive effects of taxation. Although the results of optimal tax simulations are sensitive to factual assumptions (relating to the rate at which the marginal utility of money declines, the strength of the disincentive effects of taxation, and the distribution of wage rates) and to the choice of social welfare function, one result is surprisingly robust: the marginal tax rate rises through the bottom decile of the societal wage distribution, but falls as income increases thereafter. These results provide high-level intellectual support for the attack on progressive marginal rates by the flat tax movement. To date, however, optimal tax simulations have uniformly assumed that much or all of the revenue raised by taxation will be used to finance universal cash grants (\"demogrants\"), and the combined effect of the cash grants and the regressive marginal rate structure has been optimal tax-and-transfer systems with progressivity of average (as contrasted with marginal) tax rates. The paper criticizes the demogrant assumption as politically unrealistic, and considers whether optimal marginal rates would continue to be regressive if demogrants are ruled out on political grounds?i.e., if the only purpose of taxation is to finance non-redistributive governmental functions. The paper reports on the results of a simulation which assumes no demogrants, a poverty-level exemption (zero bracket), and two rate brackets above the exemption. In that case, the second bracket rate should be higher than the first. In other words, without demogrants the optimal two-bracket tax system has progressive marginal rates. Thus the reliance on optimal tax analysis by flat tax proponents is inappropriate, if those proponents do not also support demogrants. The paper also surveys the optimal tax literature for other indications progressive marginal rates may be optimal under non-standard assumptions. In particular, progressive marginal rates may be optimal (even in the context of demogrants) if people care about relative levels of consumption, if there is significant wage uncertainty, or if the distribution of wage rates is different from that usually assumed.","PeriodicalId":180571,"journal":{"name":"Tax Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.163381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Optimal tax analysis attempts to find the income tax rate structure which maximizes social welfare, under a chosen social welfare function (which can range from purely utilitarian to a Rawlsian maximin). It provides sophisticated mathematical techniques for balancing the welfare gains from redistribution against the welfare losses from the disincentive effects of taxation. Although the results of optimal tax simulations are sensitive to factual assumptions (relating to the rate at which the marginal utility of money declines, the strength of the disincentive effects of taxation, and the distribution of wage rates) and to the choice of social welfare function, one result is surprisingly robust: the marginal tax rate rises through the bottom decile of the societal wage distribution, but falls as income increases thereafter. These results provide high-level intellectual support for the attack on progressive marginal rates by the flat tax movement. To date, however, optimal tax simulations have uniformly assumed that much or all of the revenue raised by taxation will be used to finance universal cash grants ("demogrants"), and the combined effect of the cash grants and the regressive marginal rate structure has been optimal tax-and-transfer systems with progressivity of average (as contrasted with marginal) tax rates. The paper criticizes the demogrant assumption as politically unrealistic, and considers whether optimal marginal rates would continue to be regressive if demogrants are ruled out on political grounds?i.e., if the only purpose of taxation is to finance non-redistributive governmental functions. The paper reports on the results of a simulation which assumes no demogrants, a poverty-level exemption (zero bracket), and two rate brackets above the exemption. In that case, the second bracket rate should be higher than the first. In other words, without demogrants the optimal two-bracket tax system has progressive marginal rates. Thus the reliance on optimal tax analysis by flat tax proponents is inappropriate, if those proponents do not also support demogrants. The paper also surveys the optimal tax literature for other indications progressive marginal rates may be optimal under non-standard assumptions. In particular, progressive marginal rates may be optimal (even in the context of demogrants) if people care about relative levels of consumption, if there is significant wage uncertainty, or if the distribution of wage rates is different from that usually assumed.
累进所得税能否通过最优税收分析?
最优税收分析试图在选定的社会福利函数(范围可以从纯粹功利主义到罗尔斯最大化)下,找到使社会福利最大化的所得税率结构。它提供了复杂的数学技术来平衡再分配带来的福利收益和税收抑制效应带来的福利损失。尽管最优税收模拟的结果对事实假设(与货币边际效用下降的速度有关,税收抑制效应的强度,以及工资率的分布)和社会福利函数的选择很敏感,但有一个结果令人惊讶地强大:边际税率在社会工资分配的底部十分之一上升,但随着收入的增加而下降。这些结果为单一税运动对累进边际税率的攻击提供了高层次的智力支持。然而,迄今为止,最优税收模拟一致假设,大部分或全部税收收入将用于资助普遍的现金补助(“民主补助”),现金补助和累退边际税率结构的综合影响是最优的税收和转移制度,其累进率为平均(与边际)税率相对。本文批评了民主假设在政治上是不现实的,并考虑了如果民主被排除在政治原因之外,最优边际税率是否会继续是递减的?如果税收的唯一目的是为非再分配的政府职能提供资金的话。本文报告了一个模拟的结果,该模拟假设没有民主,贫困水平豁免(零级),以及豁免以上的两个税率等级。在这种情况下,第二个括号的税率应该高于第一个。换句话说,没有民主党人,最优的两级税制是累进边际税率。因此,如果单一税的支持者不支持民主,那么他们对最优税收分析的依赖是不合适的。本文还考察了在非标准假设下累进边际税率可能是最优的其他指标的最佳税收文献。特别是,如果人们关心消费的相对水平,如果存在显著的工资不确定性,或者如果工资率的分布与通常假设的不同,累进边际税率可能是最优的(即使在民主的背景下)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信