Hacı Bektaş and his Contested Legacy: The Abdals of Rum, the Bektashi Order and the (Proto-) Kizilbash Communities

Ayfer Karakaya-Stump
{"title":"Hacı Bektaş and his Contested Legacy: The Abdals of Rum, the Bektashi Order and the (Proto-) Kizilbash Communities","authors":"Ayfer Karakaya-Stump","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474432689.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 takes up the issue of the relationship between the Kizilbash/Alevi communities and the Bektashi order, tracing its roots to their common association with the cult of Hacı Bektaş and their shared links to the Abdals of Rum. This chapter challenges Köprülü’s conjecture of an insular Turkish folk Islam transferred under the cover of the Yesevi Sufi order from Central Asia to Anatolia, and inherited in its new home by successive heterodox circles within a linear evolutionary scheme; it was purported to have passed from the Yeseviyye to the Abdals of Rum, an itinerant dervish group active in late medieval Anatolia, and from them onto the better institutionalized Bektashi order. Within this framework, Köprülü treated the Kizilbash/Alevis as lay followers of the Bektashi order. Evidence emerging from Alevi sources complicates this picture. They disclose no evidence of a Yesevi connection. Nor do they validate Köprülü’s view of the Alevis as lay followers of the Bektashi order. While they do confirm the closely intertwined trajectories of the two affiliations, their interactions and eventual partial fusion appear to have involved a much more contested process than presumed by Köprülü, tensions crystallizing especially around the spiritual legacy of Hacı Bektaş.","PeriodicalId":106563,"journal":{"name":"The Kizilbash-Alevis in Ottoman Anatolia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kizilbash-Alevis in Ottoman Anatolia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474432689.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 takes up the issue of the relationship between the Kizilbash/Alevi communities and the Bektashi order, tracing its roots to their common association with the cult of Hacı Bektaş and their shared links to the Abdals of Rum. This chapter challenges Köprülü’s conjecture of an insular Turkish folk Islam transferred under the cover of the Yesevi Sufi order from Central Asia to Anatolia, and inherited in its new home by successive heterodox circles within a linear evolutionary scheme; it was purported to have passed from the Yeseviyye to the Abdals of Rum, an itinerant dervish group active in late medieval Anatolia, and from them onto the better institutionalized Bektashi order. Within this framework, Köprülü treated the Kizilbash/Alevis as lay followers of the Bektashi order. Evidence emerging from Alevi sources complicates this picture. They disclose no evidence of a Yesevi connection. Nor do they validate Köprülü’s view of the Alevis as lay followers of the Bektashi order. While they do confirm the closely intertwined trajectories of the two affiliations, their interactions and eventual partial fusion appear to have involved a much more contested process than presumed by Köprülü, tensions crystallizing especially around the spiritual legacy of Hacı Bektaş.
哈奇·贝克塔伊和他有争议的遗产:拉姆的阿布达尔人,贝克塔伊秩序和(原)克齐尔巴什社区
第三章讨论了Kizilbash/Alevi社区与Bektashi教团之间的关系问题,将其根源追溯到他们与haaci Bektashi邪教的共同联系以及他们与Rum的Abdals的共同联系。本章挑战Köprülü的猜想,即一个孤立的土耳其民间伊斯兰教在Yesevi Sufi秩序的掩护下从中亚转移到安纳托利亚,并在线性进化方案中由连续的异端圈子继承在其新家园;据说它从Yeseviyye传到了Rum的Abdals,这是一个活跃于中世纪晚期安纳托利亚的流动苦行僧团体,从他们那里传到了更制度化的Bektashi秩序。在这个框架内,Köprülü将Kizilbash/Alevis视为Bektashi命令的外行追随者。来自阿勒维来源的证据使这一图景变得复杂。他们没有透露任何与叶塞维有关的证据。他们也没有证实Köprülü关于Alevis是Bektashi命令的世俗追随者的观点。虽然它们确实证实了两种从属关系紧密交织的轨迹,但它们的相互作用和最终的部分融合似乎涉及了一个比Köprülü所假设的更具争议的过程,特别是围绕haacyi bektasu的精神遗产的紧张局势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信