Evaluation System of Scientific Research Performance for Teachers of Humanities in American Colleges and Universities and Its Enlightenment

Ermi Zhang, Wanbing Shi
{"title":"Evaluation System of Scientific Research Performance for Teachers of Humanities in American Colleges and Universities and Its Enlightenment","authors":"Ermi Zhang, Wanbing Shi","doi":"10.2991/ICCESE-19.2019.325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States is the first country in the world to establish a scientific research performance evaluation system for the teachers of humanities, experiencing the whole process from the exploration period to the practice period. Its evaluation subjects are extremely pluralistic, the evaluation standards are different in disciplines, the evaluation indexes are both scientific and objective, and the evaluation methods are professional. Combined with the problems existing in the evaluation of scientific research performance of humanities teachers in colleges and universities in China, and the successful experience of that in American universities, it is proposed that, in the process of constructing the evaluation system of scientific research performance of university teachers in China, it is necessary to highlight the independent evaluation status, strengthen the flexible evaluation criteria, build a detailed index system and a perfect evaluation method. Keywords—America; colleges and universities; humanities; teacher scientific research performance evaluation system;","PeriodicalId":373193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019)","volume":"295 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICCESE-19.2019.325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States is the first country in the world to establish a scientific research performance evaluation system for the teachers of humanities, experiencing the whole process from the exploration period to the practice period. Its evaluation subjects are extremely pluralistic, the evaluation standards are different in disciplines, the evaluation indexes are both scientific and objective, and the evaluation methods are professional. Combined with the problems existing in the evaluation of scientific research performance of humanities teachers in colleges and universities in China, and the successful experience of that in American universities, it is proposed that, in the process of constructing the evaluation system of scientific research performance of university teachers in China, it is necessary to highlight the independent evaluation status, strengthen the flexible evaluation criteria, build a detailed index system and a perfect evaluation method. Keywords—America; colleges and universities; humanities; teacher scientific research performance evaluation system;
美国高校人文学科教师科研绩效评价体系及其启示
美国是世界上最早建立人文学科教师科研绩效评价体系的国家,经历了从探索期到实践期的全过程。其评价主体极其多元化,评价标准各学科不同,评价指标既科学又客观,评价方法具有专业性。结合我国高校人文学科教师科研绩效评价中存在的问题,以及美国高校人文学科教师科研绩效评价的成功经验,提出在构建我国高校教师科研绩效评价体系的过程中,要突出自主评价地位,加强灵活评价标准,建立详细的指标体系和完善的评价方法。Keywords-America;高等院校;人文学科;教师科研绩效评价体系;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信