Citizenship Under Pressure: Mapping Debates Over Religious Freedom In The Second Decade In Quebec

Azeddine Hmimssa
{"title":"Citizenship Under Pressure: Mapping Debates Over Religious Freedom In The Second Decade In Quebec","authors":"Azeddine Hmimssa","doi":"10.3138/jcs-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years and following a long process of secularization, social change, and immigration, Quebec is currently a diverse environment with rich dynamics around Quebecness, citizenship, identity politics, and reasonable accommodations. Following sensitive political events, Quebec saw many battles over secularism and religious pluralism. A series of debates were enmeshed with political debates about the true meaning of secularism and embroiled with fear of religion and immigrants. This ethnographic inquiry maps out the existing tendencies during different periods of repercussions and tensions around Quebec’s secularism. The article outlines key clustering patterns and ethicoreligious hierarchies and their genesis while responding to the 2013 Charter of Values of Quebec, the debates on the 2014 attacks against Canadian soldiers by presumed ISIS members in Canada, and the 2019 secularism law, Bill 21, adopted by the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government in June 2019. The fieldwork was conducted between May 2013 and June 2020 and is based on 44 events and interviews with major key participants (Catholics, Muslims, Secularists) in Montreal. The main findings show that the dynamics behind the incongruities within social groups appear to be generating overlapping alliances; while discourses of many groups seem to be unified in appearance, they are divided into many layers, which serves the purpose of opposing or supporting the government’s policies and legislation. Partnerships created in such conditions remain ephemeral, restrained with an allegiance to the same political tendency, and controlled by cultural or ideological homogeneity. Furthermore, there is more hate and violence when perpetrators believe that they benefit from anonymity.","PeriodicalId":265433,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'études canadiennes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years and following a long process of secularization, social change, and immigration, Quebec is currently a diverse environment with rich dynamics around Quebecness, citizenship, identity politics, and reasonable accommodations. Following sensitive political events, Quebec saw many battles over secularism and religious pluralism. A series of debates were enmeshed with political debates about the true meaning of secularism and embroiled with fear of religion and immigrants. This ethnographic inquiry maps out the existing tendencies during different periods of repercussions and tensions around Quebec’s secularism. The article outlines key clustering patterns and ethicoreligious hierarchies and their genesis while responding to the 2013 Charter of Values of Quebec, the debates on the 2014 attacks against Canadian soldiers by presumed ISIS members in Canada, and the 2019 secularism law, Bill 21, adopted by the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government in June 2019. The fieldwork was conducted between May 2013 and June 2020 and is based on 44 events and interviews with major key participants (Catholics, Muslims, Secularists) in Montreal. The main findings show that the dynamics behind the incongruities within social groups appear to be generating overlapping alliances; while discourses of many groups seem to be unified in appearance, they are divided into many layers, which serves the purpose of opposing or supporting the government’s policies and legislation. Partnerships created in such conditions remain ephemeral, restrained with an allegiance to the same political tendency, and controlled by cultural or ideological homogeneity. Furthermore, there is more hate and violence when perpetrators believe that they benefit from anonymity.
压力下的公民身份:描绘魁北克第二个十年宗教自由的辩论
近年来,经过长期的世俗化、社会变革和移民过程,魁北克目前是一个多元化的环境,在魁北克、公民身份、身份政治和合理的住宿方面有着丰富的动态。在敏感的政治事件之后,魁北克见证了许多关于世俗主义和宗教多元主义的斗争。一系列的辩论与关于世俗主义真正含义的政治辩论交织在一起,并与对宗教和移民的恐惧交织在一起。这个民族志调查绘制出存在的趋势在不同时期的反响和紧张围绕魁北克的世俗主义。本文概述了主要的集群模式和种族宗教等级及其起源,同时回应了2013年魁北克价值观宪章,2014年在加拿大被推定为ISIS成员袭击加拿大士兵的辩论,以及2019年世俗主义法,第21号法案,由联盟Avenir qu(CAQ)政府于2019年6月通过。实地调查于2013年5月至2020年6月期间进行,基于44次活动和对蒙特利尔主要参与者(天主教徒、穆斯林、世俗主义者)的采访。主要发现表明,社会群体内部不协调背后的动力似乎正在产生重叠的联盟;许多群体的话语虽然表面上是统一的,但实际上是有很多层次的,都是为了反对或支持政府的政策和立法。在这种情况下建立的伙伴关系仍然是短暂的,受到对同一政治倾向的忠诚的限制,并受到文化或意识形态同质性的控制。此外,当犯罪者认为他们从匿名中受益时,就会有更多的仇恨和暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书