Information Flows, the Accuracy of Opinions, and Crashes in a Dynamic Network

ERN: Search Pub Date : 2017-03-02 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3044458
Phillip J. Monin, Richard M. Bookstaber
{"title":"Information Flows, the Accuracy of Opinions, and Crashes in a Dynamic Network","authors":"Phillip J. Monin, Richard M. Bookstaber","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3044458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Markets coordinate the flow of information in the economy, aggregating it through the price mechanism. We develop a dynamic model of information transmission and aggregation in financial and other social networks in which continued membership in the network is contingent on the accuracy of opinions. Agents have opinions about a state of the world and form links to others in a directed fashion probabilistically. Agents update their opinions by averaging those of their connections, weighted by how long their connections have been in the system. Agents survive or die based on how far their opinions are from the true state. In contrast to the results in the extant literature on DeGroot learning, we show through simulations that for some parameterizations the model cycles stochastically between periods of high connectivity, in which agents arrive at a consensus opinion close to the state, and periods of low connectivity in which agents’ opinions are widely dispersed. We add varying degrees of homophily through a model parameter called tribal preference and find that crash frequency is decreasing in the degree of homophily. Our results suggest that the information aggregation function of markets can fail solely because of the dynamics of information flows, irrespective of shocks or news.","PeriodicalId":153208,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Search","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Markets coordinate the flow of information in the economy, aggregating it through the price mechanism. We develop a dynamic model of information transmission and aggregation in financial and other social networks in which continued membership in the network is contingent on the accuracy of opinions. Agents have opinions about a state of the world and form links to others in a directed fashion probabilistically. Agents update their opinions by averaging those of their connections, weighted by how long their connections have been in the system. Agents survive or die based on how far their opinions are from the true state. In contrast to the results in the extant literature on DeGroot learning, we show through simulations that for some parameterizations the model cycles stochastically between periods of high connectivity, in which agents arrive at a consensus opinion close to the state, and periods of low connectivity in which agents’ opinions are widely dispersed. We add varying degrees of homophily through a model parameter called tribal preference and find that crash frequency is decreasing in the degree of homophily. Our results suggest that the information aggregation function of markets can fail solely because of the dynamics of information flows, irrespective of shocks or news.
动态网络中的信息流、意见的准确性和崩溃
市场协调经济中的信息流动,通过价格机制将信息聚集起来。我们在金融和其他社会网络中开发了一个动态的信息传递和聚合模型,在这个模型中,网络中的持续成员取决于意见的准确性。智能体对世界的状态有自己的看法,并以一种定向的概率方式与其他智能体建立联系。代理通过对其连接的平均值进行更新,并根据其连接在系统中存在的时间进行加权。代理人的生存或死亡取决于他们的观点与真实状态的差距。与现有DeGroot学习文献的结果相反,我们通过模拟表明,对于一些参数化,模型在高连通性时期随机循环,其中智能体在接近状态时达成共识意见,而在低连通性时期,智能体的意见广泛分散。我们通过一个称为部落偏好的模型参数加入不同程度的同质性,发现碰撞频率随着同质性的程度而降低。我们的研究结果表明,市场的信息聚合功能可能仅仅因为信息流的动态而失效,而与冲击或新闻无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信