Effect of Tracking System Configurations to Beam Aperture Irradiance of Parabolic Dish in Bandung, Indonesia

Nur Rohmah, G. Pikra, Rakhmad Indra Pramana, A. J. Purwanto, A. Rajani
{"title":"Effect of Tracking System Configurations to Beam Aperture Irradiance of Parabolic Dish in Bandung, Indonesia","authors":"Nur Rohmah, G. Pikra, Rakhmad Indra Pramana, A. J. Purwanto, A. Rajani","doi":"10.1109/icseea47812.2019.8938650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collector surface of the parabolic dish solar power plant can be installed in some configurations, such as fixed (non-tracking), single axis, and two-axis tracking system. This paper presents the effect of tracking system configurations to beam aperture irradiance calculation result by comparing fixed (non-tracking) and two-axis tracking system. Both configurations were designed by measuring beam normal irradiance and calculating the angle of incidence. The beam normal irradiance was measured in Bandung, Indonesia on 26 July 2019 at 07:07 until 16:07. The angle of incidence of fixed (non-tracking) was calculated by determining the constant and independent variable of design, calculating solar altitude angle and solar azimuth angle. The independent variables were aperture tilt angle and aperture azimuth angle. The design result for fixed (non-tracking) system in Bandung at that date, the highest sum of beam aperture irradiance during that periods was obtained at aperture tilt angle 15° and aperture azimuth angle 15°. The two-axis tracking gave a better result of beam aperture irradiance than fixed (non-tracking) at that position with the difference of 14.19%. However, fixed (non-tracking) gave simpler operation and cheaper operating costs than two-axis tracking.","PeriodicalId":232017,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icseea47812.2019.8938650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The collector surface of the parabolic dish solar power plant can be installed in some configurations, such as fixed (non-tracking), single axis, and two-axis tracking system. This paper presents the effect of tracking system configurations to beam aperture irradiance calculation result by comparing fixed (non-tracking) and two-axis tracking system. Both configurations were designed by measuring beam normal irradiance and calculating the angle of incidence. The beam normal irradiance was measured in Bandung, Indonesia on 26 July 2019 at 07:07 until 16:07. The angle of incidence of fixed (non-tracking) was calculated by determining the constant and independent variable of design, calculating solar altitude angle and solar azimuth angle. The independent variables were aperture tilt angle and aperture azimuth angle. The design result for fixed (non-tracking) system in Bandung at that date, the highest sum of beam aperture irradiance during that periods was obtained at aperture tilt angle 15° and aperture azimuth angle 15°. The two-axis tracking gave a better result of beam aperture irradiance than fixed (non-tracking) at that position with the difference of 14.19%. However, fixed (non-tracking) gave simpler operation and cheaper operating costs than two-axis tracking.
跟踪系统配置对印尼万隆抛物面天线光束孔径辐照度的影响
抛物面式太阳能电站集热器表面可以安装固定(不跟踪)、单轴、双轴跟踪系统等几种配置。通过对固定(非跟踪)和双轴跟踪系统的比较,给出了跟踪系统配置对光束孔径辐照度计算结果的影响。通过测量光束的法向辐照度和计算入射角,设计了两种结构。光束正常辐照度于2019年7月26日07:07至16:07在印度尼西亚万隆测量。通过确定设计常数和自变量,计算太阳高度角和太阳方位角,计算固定(非跟踪)入射角。自变量为孔径倾斜角和孔径方位角。万隆当日固定(非跟踪)系统设计结果显示,在孔径倾角为15°和孔径方位角为15°时,各时段光束孔径辐照度总和最高。两轴跟踪的光束孔径辐照度优于固定(非跟踪),差值为14.19%。但是,固定(不跟踪)比两轴跟踪操作更简单,运行成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信