Estimating the Economic Impact of the 2021 Dream Act

Ike Brannon, M. K. McGee
{"title":"Estimating the Economic Impact of the 2021 Dream Act","authors":"Ike Brannon, M. K. McGee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3861371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012 President Obama established Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, providing legal protection for foreign nationals who arrived in the U.S. as children. In 2017 President Trump took steps to end DACA, only to be rebuffed by the courts. In 2021 President Biden reinstated DACA.<br><br>DACA protects only those who arrived as children under the age of 16 before June 2007. That leaves millions of other foreign nationals who arrived in the U.S. with their families, either as 16- or 17-year-olds before June 2007, or under the age of 18 in the subsequent nine years, without recourse to obtain employment or various other legal protections themselves. Recently proposed legislation – The 2021 Dream Act, co-sponsored by Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Durbin – would make DACA’s protections permanent, while extending those protections to up to 500,000 other minors.<br><br>We estimate the economic and budgetary impact of the passage of the bill. Our analysis suggests that it would lock in the current gains from DACA, which include nearly $57 billion of additional federal tax revenue in the 2022-2031 budget window, and $92 billion in additional income for this population. By extending DACA’s protections, it would also generate nearly $20 billion of additional federal tax revenue in the 2022-2031 budget window, while boosting the income of those who gain this protection by approximately $26 billion. The total impact it would have on U.S. economic activity would be well above this increased income.<br><br>Because of the young age of most of these potential Dreamers, most of their increased earnings from obtaining legal status would accrue outside the budget window, which means that incremental revenues from passing the 2021 Dream Act would grow sharply in subsequent years.","PeriodicalId":342163,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3861371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2012 President Obama established Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, providing legal protection for foreign nationals who arrived in the U.S. as children. In 2017 President Trump took steps to end DACA, only to be rebuffed by the courts. In 2021 President Biden reinstated DACA.

DACA protects only those who arrived as children under the age of 16 before June 2007. That leaves millions of other foreign nationals who arrived in the U.S. with their families, either as 16- or 17-year-olds before June 2007, or under the age of 18 in the subsequent nine years, without recourse to obtain employment or various other legal protections themselves. Recently proposed legislation – The 2021 Dream Act, co-sponsored by Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Durbin – would make DACA’s protections permanent, while extending those protections to up to 500,000 other minors.

We estimate the economic and budgetary impact of the passage of the bill. Our analysis suggests that it would lock in the current gains from DACA, which include nearly $57 billion of additional federal tax revenue in the 2022-2031 budget window, and $92 billion in additional income for this population. By extending DACA’s protections, it would also generate nearly $20 billion of additional federal tax revenue in the 2022-2031 budget window, while boosting the income of those who gain this protection by approximately $26 billion. The total impact it would have on U.S. economic activity would be well above this increased income.

Because of the young age of most of these potential Dreamers, most of their increased earnings from obtaining legal status would accrue outside the budget window, which means that incremental revenues from passing the 2021 Dream Act would grow sharply in subsequent years.
估计2021年梦想法案的经济影响
2012年,奥巴马总统建立了“童年抵美者暂缓遣返计划”(DACA),为儿童时期抵达美国的外国人提供法律保护。2017年,特朗普总统采取措施结束DACA,结果被法院驳回。2021年,拜登总统恢复了DACA。DACA只保护那些在2007年6月之前以16岁以下儿童身份抵达美国的人。这使得数百万与家人一起抵达美国的外国人,无论是在2007年6月之前16岁或17岁,还是在随后的九年里不满18岁的人,都无法获得就业或其他各种法律保护。最近提出的立法——由参议员林赛·格雷厄姆和理查德·德宾共同发起的2021年梦想法案——将使DACA的保护永久化,同时将这些保护扩大到多达50万名其他未成年人。我们估计了通过该法案对经济和预算的影响。我们的分析表明,它将锁定DACA的当前收益,其中包括2022-2031年预算窗口期间近570亿美元的额外联邦税收收入,以及920亿美元的额外收入。通过延长DACA的保护,它还将在2022-2031年的预算窗口中产生近200亿美元的额外联邦税收,同时使获得这项保护的人的收入增加约260亿美元。它对美国经济活动的总体影响将远远超过增加的收入。由于这些潜在梦想者中的大多数人都很年轻,他们通过获得合法身份而增加的大部分收入将在预算窗口之外积累,这意味着通过2021年梦想法案的增量收入将在随后几年大幅增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信