CONCEPT ANALYSIS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN CONVENTIONAL AND ISLAMIC BANKS ON PERIODE 2016-2020

Annisa Kusumawardani, Insiyatul Iftitah
{"title":"CONCEPT ANALYSIS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN CONVENTIONAL AND ISLAMIC BANKS ON PERIODE 2016-2020","authors":"Annisa Kusumawardani, Insiyatul Iftitah","doi":"10.30996/jem17.v7i1.6508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banking is one of the essential elements of economic sustainability. Indonesia has two banking systems: banking with conventional principles and banking with sharia principles. Differences in the regulation of the system can affect the results of the bank's performance. So, it is necessary to analyze the comparison of bank performance to determine the significance of the differences. This research aims to present the findings of a financial performance analysis carried out on Islamic and conventional banks' financial statements in 2016-2020. This study analyzes by looking at financial performance ratios consisting of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Operating Costs, and Operating Income (BOPO), and Financing Deposit Ratio (FDR). ) using SPSS. 36. The results obtained are significant differences between CAR, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and FDR of conventional and Islamic banks. Islamic banks' CAR, ROE, BOPO, and FDR values are better than conventional banks, while conventional banks' ROA is better than Islamic banks. \nKeywords: Conventional Banks, Financial Performance, Islamic Banks","PeriodicalId":431079,"journal":{"name":"JEM17: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM17: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30996/jem17.v7i1.6508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Banking is one of the essential elements of economic sustainability. Indonesia has two banking systems: banking with conventional principles and banking with sharia principles. Differences in the regulation of the system can affect the results of the bank's performance. So, it is necessary to analyze the comparison of bank performance to determine the significance of the differences. This research aims to present the findings of a financial performance analysis carried out on Islamic and conventional banks' financial statements in 2016-2020. This study analyzes by looking at financial performance ratios consisting of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Operating Costs, and Operating Income (BOPO), and Financing Deposit Ratio (FDR). ) using SPSS. 36. The results obtained are significant differences between CAR, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and FDR of conventional and Islamic banks. Islamic banks' CAR, ROE, BOPO, and FDR values are better than conventional banks, while conventional banks' ROA is better than Islamic banks. Keywords: Conventional Banks, Financial Performance, Islamic Banks
传统银行和伊斯兰银行2016-2020年期间的概念分析和财务业绩
银行业是经济可持续性的基本要素之一。印尼有两种银行体系:传统原则的银行体系和伊斯兰教原则的银行体系。监管制度的差异会影响银行绩效的结果。因此,有必要对银行绩效进行分析比较,以确定差异的意义。本研究旨在展示2016-2020年对伊斯兰银行和传统银行财务报表进行财务绩效分析的结果。本研究通过考察由资本充足率(CAR)、资产收益率(ROA)、股本收益率(ROE)、运营成本和运营收入(BOPO)以及融资存款比率(FDR)组成的财务绩效比率进行分析。使用SPSS。36. 结果表明,传统银行和伊斯兰银行的CAR、ROA、ROE、BOPO和FDR存在显著差异。伊斯兰银行的CAR、ROE、BOPO和FDR值优于传统银行,而传统银行的ROA优于伊斯兰银行。关键词:传统银行,财务绩效,伊斯兰银行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信