{"title":"Between Ethos and Moralité: Reading La Fontaine's \"Préface\" to the Fables","authors":"S. Bold","doi":"10.7202/1076090AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a reading of La Fontaine’s puzzling and coy preface to his first volume of Fables. Presented at the start as a friendly debate between the author and a rival, the “Préface” becomes an ironic sort of performance art that reveals the fabulist’s own ambivalence toward a genre that has come to him cloaked in the sober robes of a moralizing pedagogy. La Fontaine tries on the costume and does his best to play the part, composing his role from the illustrious examples of Socrates — a fabulist in extremis — and eventually a crafty Aesop, only to show us little by little that he is more a poet and artist than a moralist. Distrustful of those who would lecture on virtue and rectitude, La Fontaine’s teaching anticipates at once Rousseau’s negative education in the Émile and also Victor Turner’s pedagogy of anti-structure.","PeriodicalId":311064,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie French Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1076090AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper proposes a reading of La Fontaine’s puzzling and coy preface to his first volume of Fables. Presented at the start as a friendly debate between the author and a rival, the “Préface” becomes an ironic sort of performance art that reveals the fabulist’s own ambivalence toward a genre that has come to him cloaked in the sober robes of a moralizing pedagogy. La Fontaine tries on the costume and does his best to play the part, composing his role from the illustrious examples of Socrates — a fabulist in extremis — and eventually a crafty Aesop, only to show us little by little that he is more a poet and artist than a moralist. Distrustful of those who would lecture on virtue and rectitude, La Fontaine’s teaching anticipates at once Rousseau’s negative education in the Émile and also Victor Turner’s pedagogy of anti-structure.