E. Peri, E. Ambrosini, A. Pedrocchi, E. Pagliano, D. Riva, G. Baranello, M. Arnoldi, M. Foscan, A. Corlatti, A. Marchi, G. Ferrigno, S. Ferrante
{"title":"Volitional Cycling Augmented by Functional Electrical stimulation in Hemiparetic Adolescents: a Case Series Study","authors":"E. Peri, E. Ambrosini, A. Pedrocchi, E. Pagliano, D. Riva, G. Baranello, M. Arnoldi, M. Foscan, A. Corlatti, A. Marchi, G. Ferrigno, S. Ferrante","doi":"10.2298/JAC1301037P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility of a treatment based on \n volitional cycling augmented by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) on \n hemiparetic adolescents. Six chronic hemiparetic adolescents were included in \n a case series study. Patients underwent FES-cycling training combined with \n voluntary pedaling. The intervention consisted of 21 sessions lasting 30 \n minutes each. Patients were evaluated before, after training, and at a \n 3-month follow-up visit through clinical scales (Winter scale, observational \n gait scale, gross motor function measurement, Boyd test and Ashworth scale), \n a standard gait analysis and a voluntary pedaling test. Results were compared \n with an age-matched healthy control group (N=6). Two subjects withdrew the \n study before the completion of the intervention. Concerning the four \n remaining subjects, the clinical scales showed a slight level of disability \n already at baseline and no changes were observed after the intervention. In \n terms of walking ability, some significant improvements (Kruskal-Wallis test, \n p-value<0.05) were obtained after training in two out of four subjects: an \n increase of about 16% and 41% of the ankle range of motion and of about 18% \n and 33% of the ankle propelling power were achieved for two subjects, \n respectively. During pedaling, the work produced by the paretic leg while \n pulling the pedal significantly increased in 3 out of 4 subjects. In one \n subject a more symmetrical cycling movement was observed, whilst for another \n subject a significant improvement in terms of co-contraction between rectus \n femoris and biceps femoris was achieved. In conclusion, this study assessed \n the feasibility of FES-cycling training on hemiparetic adolescents, but did \n not provide evidences about the effectiveness of this intervention in \n improving motor recovery and walking ability. However, since only a small \n group of patients with a low level of disability was involved in the study, \n further investigations are needed to provide conclusive results.","PeriodicalId":403523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Automatic Control","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/JAC1301037P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility of a treatment based on
volitional cycling augmented by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) on
hemiparetic adolescents. Six chronic hemiparetic adolescents were included in
a case series study. Patients underwent FES-cycling training combined with
voluntary pedaling. The intervention consisted of 21 sessions lasting 30
minutes each. Patients were evaluated before, after training, and at a
3-month follow-up visit through clinical scales (Winter scale, observational
gait scale, gross motor function measurement, Boyd test and Ashworth scale),
a standard gait analysis and a voluntary pedaling test. Results were compared
with an age-matched healthy control group (N=6). Two subjects withdrew the
study before the completion of the intervention. Concerning the four
remaining subjects, the clinical scales showed a slight level of disability
already at baseline and no changes were observed after the intervention. In
terms of walking ability, some significant improvements (Kruskal-Wallis test,
p-value<0.05) were obtained after training in two out of four subjects: an
increase of about 16% and 41% of the ankle range of motion and of about 18%
and 33% of the ankle propelling power were achieved for two subjects,
respectively. During pedaling, the work produced by the paretic leg while
pulling the pedal significantly increased in 3 out of 4 subjects. In one
subject a more symmetrical cycling movement was observed, whilst for another
subject a significant improvement in terms of co-contraction between rectus
femoris and biceps femoris was achieved. In conclusion, this study assessed
the feasibility of FES-cycling training on hemiparetic adolescents, but did
not provide evidences about the effectiveness of this intervention in
improving motor recovery and walking ability. However, since only a small
group of patients with a low level of disability was involved in the study,
further investigations are needed to provide conclusive results.