A Hypothesis on the Origin of Old Chinese Pharyngealization (上古漢語咽化聲母來源的一個假設)

L. Sagart, W. H. Baxter
{"title":"A Hypothesis on the Origin of Old Chinese Pharyngealization (上古漢語咽化聲母來源的一個假設)","authors":"L. Sagart, W. H. Baxter","doi":"10.1163/2405478X-00902002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is proposed that OC pharyngealized onset consonants—that is, ‘type-A’ onset consonants—arose out of Proto-Sino-Tibetan plain consonants followed by geminate vowels separated by a pharyngeal fricative. When the first copy of the geminate vowel fell, the initial consonants formed clusters with the pharyngeal fricative, evolving into the OC pharyngealized consonants we reconstruct. In the Kuki-Chin branch of Tibeto-Burman, the pharyngeal fricative fell, and long vowels resulted. This proposal supposes a statistical correlation between Kuki-Chin long vowels and OC type-A words on the one hand, and between Kuki-Chin short vowels and OC type-B words on the other, as originally proposed by S. Starostin. A significant statistic bearing on forty-three probable Chinese-Kuki-Chin cognates supports this correlation. Thus reconstructed, a precursor language of Proto-Sino-Tibetan was aligned with Proto-Austronesian and Proto-Austroasiatic in exhibiting a surface constraint against monomoraic free words: by that constraint, the vowel of an underlying monosyllable was realized as a geminate with an intervening parasitic consonant such as a glottal stop or a pharyngeal fricative, while the vowels of a disyllable remained nongeminate. After reduction of disyllables to monosyllables, this process resulted in a pharyngealized vs. nonpharyngealized consonant distinction in OC .論文提出對上古漢語咽化聲母(即“A類聲母”)來源的一個假設,認為咽化聲母來源於原始漢藏語的無標記輔音,並且此無標記輔音後跟隨著由咽部擦音[ʕ]分割的雙胞元音(geminate vowels)。在雙胞元音的前半部分脫落後,輔音聲母跟咽部擦音形成了複輔音。新形成的複輔音最終演變為上古漢語的咽化聲母。而在藏緬語庫基-欽(Kuki-Chin)語支中,則是咽化擦音脫落,使雙胞元音變為長元音。本文解釋了漢語與庫基-欽語中一個統計學的顯著相關性:一方面,庫基-欽語含長元音的詞與上古漢語含A類聲母的詞呈顯著相關;另一方面,庫基-欽語含短元音的詞與上古漢語含B類聲母的詞呈顯著相關,正如斯塔羅金(S. Starostin)所說。據此構擬,我們提出原始漢藏語、原始南島語與原始南亞語中的一個共同限制(constraint):禁止在語流中出現單音拍(monomoraic)詞。在這一限制的作用下,單音節詞的單元音發生了雙胞化(germination),雙胞元音中間插入了喉塞音或咽部擦音之類的次聲輔音。而同時,雙音節詞的元音無變化。漢語經過雙音節詞的單音節化,就形成了無標記輔音與咽化輔音的音位對立。(This article is in English.)","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00902002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is proposed that OC pharyngealized onset consonants—that is, ‘type-A’ onset consonants—arose out of Proto-Sino-Tibetan plain consonants followed by geminate vowels separated by a pharyngeal fricative. When the first copy of the geminate vowel fell, the initial consonants formed clusters with the pharyngeal fricative, evolving into the OC pharyngealized consonants we reconstruct. In the Kuki-Chin branch of Tibeto-Burman, the pharyngeal fricative fell, and long vowels resulted. This proposal supposes a statistical correlation between Kuki-Chin long vowels and OC type-A words on the one hand, and between Kuki-Chin short vowels and OC type-B words on the other, as originally proposed by S. Starostin. A significant statistic bearing on forty-three probable Chinese-Kuki-Chin cognates supports this correlation. Thus reconstructed, a precursor language of Proto-Sino-Tibetan was aligned with Proto-Austronesian and Proto-Austroasiatic in exhibiting a surface constraint against monomoraic free words: by that constraint, the vowel of an underlying monosyllable was realized as a geminate with an intervening parasitic consonant such as a glottal stop or a pharyngeal fricative, while the vowels of a disyllable remained nongeminate. After reduction of disyllables to monosyllables, this process resulted in a pharyngealized vs. nonpharyngealized consonant distinction in OC .論文提出對上古漢語咽化聲母(即“A類聲母”)來源的一個假設,認為咽化聲母來源於原始漢藏語的無標記輔音,並且此無標記輔音後跟隨著由咽部擦音[ʕ]分割的雙胞元音(geminate vowels)。在雙胞元音的前半部分脫落後,輔音聲母跟咽部擦音形成了複輔音。新形成的複輔音最終演變為上古漢語的咽化聲母。而在藏緬語庫基-欽(Kuki-Chin)語支中,則是咽化擦音脫落,使雙胞元音變為長元音。本文解釋了漢語與庫基-欽語中一個統計學的顯著相關性:一方面,庫基-欽語含長元音的詞與上古漢語含A類聲母的詞呈顯著相關;另一方面,庫基-欽語含短元音的詞與上古漢語含B類聲母的詞呈顯著相關,正如斯塔羅金(S. Starostin)所說。據此構擬,我們提出原始漢藏語、原始南島語與原始南亞語中的一個共同限制(constraint):禁止在語流中出現單音拍(monomoraic)詞。在這一限制的作用下,單音節詞的單元音發生了雙胞化(germination),雙胞元音中間插入了喉塞音或咽部擦音之類的次聲輔音。而同時,雙音節詞的元音無變化。漢語經過雙音節詞的單音節化,就形成了無標記輔音與咽化輔音的音位對立。(This article is in English.)
A Hypothesis on the Origin of Old Chinese Pharyngealization (上古汉语咽化声母来源的一个假设)
有人提出OC咽音起始辅音——即“a型”起始辅音——是由原始汉藏平原辅音和由咽部摩擦音分隔的双元音组成的。当双元音的第一个拷贝下降时,最初的辅音与咽摩擦音形成集群,演变成我们重建的OC咽音化辅音。在藏缅语的Kuki-Chin分支中,咽摩擦音下降,元音变长。本建议假设Kuki-Chin长元音与OC - a类词、Kuki-Chin短元音与OC - b类词之间存在统计学相关性,与S. Starostin最初提出的观点一致。一项关于43个可能的汉语-库奇-钦同源词的重要统计数据支持了这种相关性。因此,原始汉藏语的前身语言与原始南岛语和原始南亚洲语一致,表现出对单音节自由词的表面约束:通过这种约束,一个潜在的单音节的元音被实现为双元音,中间有一个寄生辅音,如声门顿音或咽部摩擦音,而一个双音节的元音仍然是非元音。减少双回答一两个字后,这个过程导致pharyngealized OC与nonpharyngealized辅音的区别。論文提出對上古漢語咽化聲母(即“類聲母”)來源的一個假設,認為咽化聲母來源於原始漢藏語的無標記輔音,並且此無標記輔音後跟隨著由咽部擦音[ʕ]分割的雙胞元音(成双元音)。在雙胞元音的前半部分脫落後,輔音聲母跟咽部擦音形成了複輔音。新形成的複輔音最終演變為上古漢語的咽化聲母。而在藏緬語庫基-欽(Kuki-Chin)語支中,則是咽化擦音脫落,使雙胞元音變為長元音。本文解釋了漢語與庫基-欽語中一個統計學的顯著相關性:一方面,庫基-欽語含長元音的詞與上古漢語含一个類聲母的詞呈顯著相關;另一方面,庫基-欽語含短元音的詞與上古漢語含B類聲母的詞呈顯著相關,正如斯塔羅金(S。斯塔洛斯汀據此構擬,我們提出原始漢藏語,原始南島語與原始南亞語中的一個共同限制(约束):禁止在語流中出現單音拍詞(monomoraic)。在這一限制的作用下,單音節詞的單元音發生了雙胞化(萌芽)雙胞元音中間插入了喉塞音或咽部擦音之類的次聲輔音。而同時,雙音節詞的元音無變化。漢語經過雙音節詞的單音節化,就形成了無標記輔音與咽化輔音的音位對立。(这篇文章是英文的。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信