THE USE OF PSRA AND QAR STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION

Sophia Rahmawati, Indri Nurhasanah, Yuni Indah Sari, S. Hayati
{"title":"THE USE OF PSRA AND QAR STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION","authors":"Sophia Rahmawati, Indri Nurhasanah, Yuni Indah Sari, S. Hayati","doi":"10.36982/jge.v10i2.2531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study's objectives were to determine whether or not there was any significant achievement on students' reading comprehension between students taught by PSRA Strategy, (2) whether or not there was any significant achievement on students' reading comprehension taught by QAR Strategy, and (3) whether or not there was any significant difference in students' reading comprehension achievement between students taught by PSRA Strategy and QA Strategy. The study's population consisted of all tenth grade students at SMAN 4 Kota Jambi during the academic year 2021/2022. The samples were collected by two classes, each with 32 students. This study used a quasi-experimental design with two groups of students. Cluster Sampling was used as a sampling technique. For In order to collect data, the test was given twice, once before and once after. The findings revealed that both the PSRA strategy and the QAR strategy had a significant impact on students' reading achievement in each class. Based on the data, it was discovered that the students' mean post-test score in the experimental group who were taught using the PSRA Strategy was 84.63 and the students' mean post-test score in the control group who were taught using the QAR Strategy was 79.70. However, based on the independent sample t-test analysis, the t-obtained (3.216) was found to be greater than the t-table (1.671), indicating that the null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It indicates that there was a significant difference in students' reading comprehension achievement between those taught using the PSRA Strategy and those taught using the QAR Strategy. Furthermore, the students' score achievement when using the PSRA strategy is greater than the students' score achievement when using the QAR strategy. Finally, the PSRA strategy is more significant than the QAR strategy.","PeriodicalId":112452,"journal":{"name":"Global Expert: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Expert: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36982/jge.v10i2.2531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study's objectives were to determine whether or not there was any significant achievement on students' reading comprehension between students taught by PSRA Strategy, (2) whether or not there was any significant achievement on students' reading comprehension taught by QAR Strategy, and (3) whether or not there was any significant difference in students' reading comprehension achievement between students taught by PSRA Strategy and QA Strategy. The study's population consisted of all tenth grade students at SMAN 4 Kota Jambi during the academic year 2021/2022. The samples were collected by two classes, each with 32 students. This study used a quasi-experimental design with two groups of students. Cluster Sampling was used as a sampling technique. For In order to collect data, the test was given twice, once before and once after. The findings revealed that both the PSRA strategy and the QAR strategy had a significant impact on students' reading achievement in each class. Based on the data, it was discovered that the students' mean post-test score in the experimental group who were taught using the PSRA Strategy was 84.63 and the students' mean post-test score in the control group who were taught using the QAR Strategy was 79.70. However, based on the independent sample t-test analysis, the t-obtained (3.216) was found to be greater than the t-table (1.671), indicating that the null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It indicates that there was a significant difference in students' reading comprehension achievement between those taught using the PSRA Strategy and those taught using the QAR Strategy. Furthermore, the students' score achievement when using the PSRA strategy is greater than the students' score achievement when using the QAR strategy. Finally, the PSRA strategy is more significant than the QAR strategy.
运用psra和qar策略提高十年级学生的阅读理解能力
本研究的目的是确定采用PSRA策略教学的学生在阅读理解方面是否有显著的成就;(2)采用QAR策略教学的学生在阅读理解方面是否有显著的成就;(3)采用PSRA策略与QA策略教学的学生在阅读理解方面是否有显著的差异。该研究的人群包括2021/2022学年哥打占比SMAN 4的所有十年级学生。样本由两个班级收集,每个班级有32名学生。本研究采用准实验设计,分为两组学生。采用聚类抽样作为抽样技术。为了收集数据,测试进行了两次,一次在测试前,一次在测试后。结果表明,PSRA策略和QAR策略对学生的阅读成绩均有显著影响。根据数据发现,采用PSRA策略教学的实验组学生的平均后测分数为84.63,采用QAR策略教学的对照组学生的平均后测分数为79.70。然而,通过独立样本t检验分析,得到的t(3.216)大于t表(1.671),表明拒绝原假设(Ho),接受备择假设(Ha)。结果表明,使用PSRA策略的学生与使用QAR策略的学生在阅读理解成绩上存在显著差异。此外,使用PSRA策略的学生成绩成就高于使用QAR策略的学生成绩成就。最后,PSRA策略比QAR策略更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书