{"title":"Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting and the Existence of Time-Inconsistent Retirement","authors":"T. Findley, J. Feigenbaum","doi":"10.4236/TEL.2013.32019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision about how much to save for \nretirement is likely to be dependent on when an individual plans to be retired, \nand vice versa. Yet, the established literature on hyperbolic discounting and \nlife-cycle saving behavior has for the most part abstracted from choice over \nretirement. Two notable exceptions are Diamond and Koszegi [1] and an important \nfollow-up study by Holmes [2], which demonstrates that time-inconsistent \nretirement timing is impossible when saving behavior is explicitly modeled in a \nstylized three-period setting. In this paper, we build upon the framework of \nDiamond and Koszegi [1] and Holmes [2] by generalizing the assumptions about \ninitial income and assets. We show analytically and via simple numerical \nexamples that time-inconsistent retirement can exist in a three-period \nlife-cycle model of consumption and saving.","PeriodicalId":151802,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Life Cycle Models (Topic)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Life Cycle Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/TEL.2013.32019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
The decision about how much to save for
retirement is likely to be dependent on when an individual plans to be retired,
and vice versa. Yet, the established literature on hyperbolic discounting and
life-cycle saving behavior has for the most part abstracted from choice over
retirement. Two notable exceptions are Diamond and Koszegi [1] and an important
follow-up study by Holmes [2], which demonstrates that time-inconsistent
retirement timing is impossible when saving behavior is explicitly modeled in a
stylized three-period setting. In this paper, we build upon the framework of
Diamond and Koszegi [1] and Holmes [2] by generalizing the assumptions about
initial income and assets. We show analytically and via simple numerical
examples that time-inconsistent retirement can exist in a three-period
life-cycle model of consumption and saving.