Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting and the Existence of Time-Inconsistent Retirement

T. Findley, J. Feigenbaum
{"title":"Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting and the Existence of Time-Inconsistent Retirement","authors":"T. Findley, J. Feigenbaum","doi":"10.4236/TEL.2013.32019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision about how much to save for \nretirement is likely to be dependent on when an individual plans to be retired, \nand vice versa. Yet, the established literature on hyperbolic discounting and \nlife-cycle saving behavior has for the most part abstracted from choice over \nretirement. Two notable exceptions are Diamond and Koszegi [1] and an important \nfollow-up study by Holmes [2], which demonstrates that time-inconsistent \nretirement timing is impossible when saving behavior is explicitly modeled in a \nstylized three-period setting. In this paper, we build upon the framework of \nDiamond and Koszegi [1] and Holmes [2] by generalizing the assumptions about \ninitial income and assets. We show analytically and via simple numerical \nexamples that time-inconsistent retirement can exist in a three-period \nlife-cycle model of consumption and saving.","PeriodicalId":151802,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Life Cycle Models (Topic)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Life Cycle Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/TEL.2013.32019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The decision about how much to save for retirement is likely to be dependent on when an individual plans to be retired, and vice versa. Yet, the established literature on hyperbolic discounting and life-cycle saving behavior has for the most part abstracted from choice over retirement. Two notable exceptions are Diamond and Koszegi [1] and an important follow-up study by Holmes [2], which demonstrates that time-inconsistent retirement timing is impossible when saving behavior is explicitly modeled in a stylized three-period setting. In this paper, we build upon the framework of Diamond and Koszegi [1] and Holmes [2] by generalizing the assumptions about initial income and assets. We show analytically and via simple numerical examples that time-inconsistent retirement can exist in a three-period life-cycle model of consumption and saving.
拟双曲折现与时间不一致退休的存在性
为退休存多少钱的决定很可能取决于个人计划什么时候退休,反之亦然。然而,关于双曲贴现和生命周期储蓄行为的既有文献在很大程度上是从退休选择中抽象出来的。两个值得注意的例外是Diamond和Koszegi[1]以及Holmes[2]的一项重要的后续研究,该研究表明,当储蓄行为明确地以程式化的三期设置为模型时,时间不一致的退休时间是不可能的。在本文中,我们在Diamond和Koszegi[1]和Holmes[2]的框架上,通过推广关于初始收入和资产的假设。我们分析并通过简单的数值例子表明,时间不一致的退休可以存在于消费和储蓄的三期生命周期模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信