Examination of the electronic educational resources accessibility on the university Moodle platform

Y. Kosova, A. Gapon, K. I. Redkokosh
{"title":"Examination of the electronic educational resources accessibility on the university Moodle platform","authors":"Y. Kosova, A. Gapon, K. I. Redkokosh","doi":"10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-9-5-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to assess the accessibility of electronic educational resources (EER) published in the university Moodle Learning Management System (LMS). The analysis involved 22 EERs in mathematical and information technology disciplines, located in the Moodle LMS of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. The examination algorithm included analysis using the Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE) and expert analysis of web accessibility using visual, auditory and manual methods based on 89 checklist attributes. In the result of the analysis, multiple accessibility errors of the Moodle platform and the EERs hosted on it were found. The most serious platform problems include: lack of compatibility with text browsers; errors of reproduction by screen readers; errors of content reproduction on mobile devices. The list of accessibility errors made by the authors of EERs includes: incorrect design of hyperlinks (22.7 % of the EERs); lack of subtitles (13.6 %), transcripts (22.7 %), synopses of video lectures (27.3 %); lack of alternative descriptions for figures (68.2 %); time limit for tests (9.1 %); lack of special markup for mathematical notation (36.4 %) and program code (13.6 %), etc. Results of the survey show need in training of EERs’ authors in technologies for developing accessible educational web content. It is advisable to familiarize web developers deploying an LMS at universities with the basics of web accessibility, LMS accessibility functions and modules in order to select the most suitable platform, determine and install the required set of accessibility tools. Before launching all EERs should be subject to mandatory examination for compliance with the web accessibility guidelines.","PeriodicalId":277237,"journal":{"name":"Informatics and education","volume":"111 3S 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-9-5-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to assess the accessibility of electronic educational resources (EER) published in the university Moodle Learning Management System (LMS). The analysis involved 22 EERs in mathematical and information technology disciplines, located in the Moodle LMS of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. The examination algorithm included analysis using the Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE) and expert analysis of web accessibility using visual, auditory and manual methods based on 89 checklist attributes. In the result of the analysis, multiple accessibility errors of the Moodle platform and the EERs hosted on it were found. The most serious platform problems include: lack of compatibility with text browsers; errors of reproduction by screen readers; errors of content reproduction on mobile devices. The list of accessibility errors made by the authors of EERs includes: incorrect design of hyperlinks (22.7 % of the EERs); lack of subtitles (13.6 %), transcripts (22.7 %), synopses of video lectures (27.3 %); lack of alternative descriptions for figures (68.2 %); time limit for tests (9.1 %); lack of special markup for mathematical notation (36.4 %) and program code (13.6 %), etc. Results of the survey show need in training of EERs’ authors in technologies for developing accessible educational web content. It is advisable to familiarize web developers deploying an LMS at universities with the basics of web accessibility, LMS accessibility functions and modules in order to select the most suitable platform, determine and install the required set of accessibility tools. Before launching all EERs should be subject to mandatory examination for compliance with the web accessibility guidelines.
高校Moodle平台上电子教育资源可访问性的研究
本文的目的是评估在大学Moodle学习管理系统(LMS)中发布的电子教育资源(EER)的可访问性。分析涉及数学和信息技术学科的22个EERs,位于v.i. Vernadsky克里米亚联邦大学的Moodle LMS中。检查算法包括使用Web可访问性评估工具(WAVE)进行分析,以及基于89个检查表属性使用视觉,听觉和手动方法进行Web可访问性专家分析。在分析结果中,发现Moodle平台及其上托管的EERs存在多个可访问性错误。最严重的平台问题包括:缺乏与文本浏览器的兼容性;屏幕阅读器的复制错误;在移动设备上复制内容的错误。EERs作者犯的可访问性错误包括:超链接设计错误(占EERs的22.7%);缺少字幕(13.6%)、讲稿(22.7%)、视频讲座大纲(27.3%);缺少对数字的替代描述(68.2%);测试时限(9.1%);缺乏对数学符号(36.4%)和程序代码(13.6%)等的特殊标记。调查结果表明,需要对EERs的作者进行培训,使其掌握开发无障碍教育网络内容的技术。为了选择最合适的平台,确定和安装所需的辅助工具集,建议在大学部署LMS的web开发人员熟悉web可访问性、LMS可访问性功能和模块的基础知识。所有电子资讯系统在推出前,均须接受强制性审查,以确保符合无障碍网页指引。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信