New literacy theories for participatory design: lessons from three design cases with Australian Aboriginal communities

J. L. Taylor, A. Soro, M. Brereton
{"title":"New literacy theories for participatory design: lessons from three design cases with Australian Aboriginal communities","authors":"J. L. Taylor, A. Soro, M. Brereton","doi":"10.1145/3210586.3210588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literacy and power are closely entwined, and not all literacy practices are equally supported and recognised within dominant discourses and political structures. Technology design offers new possibilities for supporting culturally-diverse literacy practices, including the preservation and maintenance of endangered languages. While literacy is an inherent aspect of design work, theories of literacy as a social practice encompassing a variety of different senses and modes of expression are under-utilised within the design community. We survey the current landscape on literacy and design, and illustrate how six lenses of new literacy theory articulated by Kathy Mills [1] can support us to be more attentive to the literacy practices enacted in design through their application to three design cases with Australian Aboriginal communities. Finally, we reflect on our own Digital Community Noticeboard project to contribute four ways that new literacy theory can inform participatory design.","PeriodicalId":210718,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Literacy and power are closely entwined, and not all literacy practices are equally supported and recognised within dominant discourses and political structures. Technology design offers new possibilities for supporting culturally-diverse literacy practices, including the preservation and maintenance of endangered languages. While literacy is an inherent aspect of design work, theories of literacy as a social practice encompassing a variety of different senses and modes of expression are under-utilised within the design community. We survey the current landscape on literacy and design, and illustrate how six lenses of new literacy theory articulated by Kathy Mills [1] can support us to be more attentive to the literacy practices enacted in design through their application to three design cases with Australian Aboriginal communities. Finally, we reflect on our own Digital Community Noticeboard project to contribute four ways that new literacy theory can inform participatory design.
参与式设计的新识字理论:来自澳洲原住民社区三个设计案例的经验教训
读写能力和权力是紧密相连的,并不是所有的读写能力都能在主流话语和政治结构中得到同等的支持和认可。技术设计为支持文化多样化的扫盲活动提供了新的可能性,包括保护和维护濒危语言。虽然识字是设计工作的一个固有方面,但识字理论作为一种包含各种不同感官和表达方式的社会实践,在设计界尚未得到充分利用。我们调查了文化与设计的现状,并阐述了Kathy Mills[1]所阐述的新文化理论的六个视角如何通过将其应用于澳大利亚土著社区的三个设计案例来支持我们更加关注设计中制定的文化实践。最后,我们反思了我们自己的数字社区布告栏项目,提出了四种新的识字理论可以为参与式设计提供信息的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信