The Merit Primacy Effect

ERN: Equity Pub Date : 2017-04-26 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2963504
A. Cappelen, K. Moene, Siv-Elisabeth Skjelbred, Bertil Tungodden
{"title":"The Merit Primacy Effect","authors":"A. Cappelen, K. Moene, Siv-Elisabeth Skjelbred, Bertil Tungodden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2963504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A long history in economics going back to Adam Smith has argued that people give primacy to merit – rather than luck – in distributive choices. We provide a theoretical framework formalizing the merit primacy effect, and study it in a novel experiment where third-party spectators redistribute from high-earners to low-earners in situations where both merit and luck determine earnings. We identify a strong and consistent merit primacy effect in the spectator behaviour. The results shed new light on inequality acceptance in society, by showing how just a little bit of merit can make people significantly more inequality accepting.","PeriodicalId":282303,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Equity","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2963504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

A long history in economics going back to Adam Smith has argued that people give primacy to merit – rather than luck – in distributive choices. We provide a theoretical framework formalizing the merit primacy effect, and study it in a novel experiment where third-party spectators redistribute from high-earners to low-earners in situations where both merit and luck determine earnings. We identify a strong and consistent merit primacy effect in the spectator behaviour. The results shed new light on inequality acceptance in society, by showing how just a little bit of merit can make people significantly more inequality accepting.
优因效应
追溯到亚当•斯密(Adam Smith)的悠久经济学历史一直认为,在分配选择中,人们优先考虑的是价值,而不是运气。我们提供了一个理论框架来形式化优点首要效应,并在一个新颖的实验中对其进行了研究,在这个实验中,在优点和运气都决定收入的情况下,第三方观众从高收入者到低收入者进行了再分配。我们在观众行为中发现了一种强烈而一致的价值至上效应。研究结果揭示了社会对不平等的接受程度,揭示了一点点优点如何能让人们更容易接受不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信