Continuous improvement in the faculty of an engineering program, ICACIT-V.3.2.

C. Aldana, Y. Saavedra, Fermin Saavedra, Carlos Lecarnaqué, Yenifer Aguirre
{"title":"Continuous improvement in the faculty of an engineering program, ICACIT-V.3.2.","authors":"C. Aldana, Y. Saavedra, Fermin Saavedra, Carlos Lecarnaqué, Yenifer Aguirre","doi":"10.1109/ICACIT56139.2022.10041503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous improvement developed by an engineering program, especially its faculty management (teaching management), would be an ordering and systematization of procedures that allow for achieving total quality progressively and efficiently. A proposal for an improvement plan (PPM) of the university academic-pedagogical management was designed, particularly in the line of action of teaching management, related to the processes of improvement and follow-up of teaching performance and development. For this purpose, the case study was a public university engineering program with an organizing committee, in which the Student Outcomes (SOs) measured and evaluated were linked to key diagnostic and performance indicators (KPIs), showing average compliance of 23.04% in the comprehensive training of students, 41.46% and 16.9% in level 2 processes, respectively. The assessment and evaluation of the SOs set a goal of 70%, but the measurement of performance in several SOs did not reach this goal, which is associated with teaching management processes at levels 0,1,2, and 3, with an average of 55.6% high risk of non-compliance. For this reason, based on the action-research, systemic, process management, agile methodology (design thinking), and logical framework approach, the subprocesses of performance and development of teaching management in an engineering program were investigated, focused on the ICACIT accreditation model version 3.2: criterion 4. Faculty, concluding in a PPM of 15 improvement opportunities identified and prioritized, framed in the university institutionalization and programs, implementation of a sustainable system of measurement and improvement of the SOs, specialized area and center for development and improvement of teaching, comprehensive system of teacher evaluation, strengthening of management, climate, culture and organizational development, appropriate management of human talent, teacher recognition, among others.","PeriodicalId":413670,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACIT56139.2022.10041503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continuous improvement developed by an engineering program, especially its faculty management (teaching management), would be an ordering and systematization of procedures that allow for achieving total quality progressively and efficiently. A proposal for an improvement plan (PPM) of the university academic-pedagogical management was designed, particularly in the line of action of teaching management, related to the processes of improvement and follow-up of teaching performance and development. For this purpose, the case study was a public university engineering program with an organizing committee, in which the Student Outcomes (SOs) measured and evaluated were linked to key diagnostic and performance indicators (KPIs), showing average compliance of 23.04% in the comprehensive training of students, 41.46% and 16.9% in level 2 processes, respectively. The assessment and evaluation of the SOs set a goal of 70%, but the measurement of performance in several SOs did not reach this goal, which is associated with teaching management processes at levels 0,1,2, and 3, with an average of 55.6% high risk of non-compliance. For this reason, based on the action-research, systemic, process management, agile methodology (design thinking), and logical framework approach, the subprocesses of performance and development of teaching management in an engineering program were investigated, focused on the ICACIT accreditation model version 3.2: criterion 4. Faculty, concluding in a PPM of 15 improvement opportunities identified and prioritized, framed in the university institutionalization and programs, implementation of a sustainable system of measurement and improvement of the SOs, specialized area and center for development and improvement of teaching, comprehensive system of teacher evaluation, strengthening of management, climate, culture and organizational development, appropriate management of human talent, teacher recognition, among others.
持续改进工程项目的教员,icacit v .3.2。
一个工程项目的持续改进,特别是它的教师管理(教学管理),将是一个有序和系统化的程序,允许逐步和有效地实现总质量。从教学管理的行动角度出发,针对教学绩效与发展的改进与跟踪过程,提出了高校学术教学管理改进计划的建议。为此,案例研究是一个有组委会的公立大学工程项目,其中测量和评估的学生成果(SOs)与关键诊断和绩效指标(kpi)相关联,在学生的综合培训中平均合规率为23.04%,在二级过程中分别为41.46%和16.9%。对SOs的评估和评价设定了70%的目标,但对几个SOs的绩效测量没有达到这一目标,这与0、1、2和3级的教学管理过程有关,平均存在55.6%的不合规高风险。为此,基于行动研究、系统管理、过程管理、敏捷方法论(设计思维)和逻辑框架方法,以ICACIT认证模型3.2版标准4为重点,对工程项目教学管理绩效和发展的子过程进行了研究。教师,在确定和优先考虑的15个改进机会的PPM中得出结论,在大学制度化和计划框架内,实施可持续的衡量和改进SOs系统,专业领域和教学发展和改进中心,教师评估综合系统,加强管理,气候,文化和组织发展,适当管理人才,教师认可等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信