Safe passage through the engineering curriculum: guiding subject experts toward integration of communication instruction and outcomes assessment

P. Sageev, K. Bernard, F. Prieto, C. Romanowski
{"title":"Safe passage through the engineering curriculum: guiding subject experts toward integration of communication instruction and outcomes assessment","authors":"P. Sageev, K. Bernard, F. Prieto, C. Romanowski","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2004.1375288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industry demands, crowded curricula, tight budgets, new educational technologies, and accreditation directives are relentlessly pushing engineering educators into unfamiliar - sometimes threatening - new frontiers. Frequently, the guide most qualified to guarantee safe passage across this daunting terrain is the technical communication professional. Experienced technical communicators accustomed to thriving on the chaotic borders between subject experts and users, engineering departments and management, old procedures and new technologies are adept at achieving multi-purpose objectives without compromising core requirements. Recent literature reveals that some of the most effective work in achieving adherence to new accreditation standards is occurring at engineering schools with established technical communication leadership. At the University at Buffalo (UB), the State University of New York for example, our Center for Technical Communication (CTC) is working with representatives from five engineering departments to develop strategies for achieving full integration of technical communication instruction within the engineering curriculum. This work, however, looks beyond instructional approaches to examine how technical communication professionals are guiding the institutionalization of effective engineering communication strategies within engineering curricula. Full integration of this core capability promises significant benefits not only to engineering students and their employers, but also to engineering schools seeking improved content mastery, higher retention rates, and higher competitive ranking.","PeriodicalId":202491,"journal":{"name":"International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2004.1375288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Industry demands, crowded curricula, tight budgets, new educational technologies, and accreditation directives are relentlessly pushing engineering educators into unfamiliar - sometimes threatening - new frontiers. Frequently, the guide most qualified to guarantee safe passage across this daunting terrain is the technical communication professional. Experienced technical communicators accustomed to thriving on the chaotic borders between subject experts and users, engineering departments and management, old procedures and new technologies are adept at achieving multi-purpose objectives without compromising core requirements. Recent literature reveals that some of the most effective work in achieving adherence to new accreditation standards is occurring at engineering schools with established technical communication leadership. At the University at Buffalo (UB), the State University of New York for example, our Center for Technical Communication (CTC) is working with representatives from five engineering departments to develop strategies for achieving full integration of technical communication instruction within the engineering curriculum. This work, however, looks beyond instructional approaches to examine how technical communication professionals are guiding the institutionalization of effective engineering communication strategies within engineering curricula. Full integration of this core capability promises significant benefits not only to engineering students and their employers, but also to engineering schools seeking improved content mastery, higher retention rates, and higher competitive ranking.
安全通过工程课程:引导学科专家整合沟通教学和成果评估
行业需求、拥挤的课程、紧张的预算、新的教育技术和认证指令无情地将工程教育工作者推向了陌生的——有时是威胁的——新领域。通常,最有资格保证安全通过这一令人生畏的地形的向导是技术交流专业人员。经验丰富的技术沟通者习惯于在学科专家和用户、工程部门和管理层、旧程序和新技术之间的混乱边界上蓬勃发展,他们擅长在不损害核心需求的情况下实现多目的目标。最近的文献显示,一些最有效的工作,以实现遵守新的认证标准是发生在工程学院建立技术沟通领导。例如,在布法罗大学(UB),纽约州立大学,我们的技术交流中心(CTC)正与来自五个工程部门的代表合作,制定战略,以实现工程课程中技术交流教学的全面整合。然而,这项工作超越了教学方法,考察了技术沟通专业人员如何在工程课程中指导有效的工程沟通策略的制度化。这一核心能力的全面整合不仅对工程专业的学生和他们的雇主有重大的好处,而且对寻求改进的内容掌握、更高的保留率和更高的竞争排名的工程学院也有重大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信