Tools for the evaluation of web accessibility: A systematic literature mapping

Patricia Agüero-Flores, Christian Quesada-López, Alexandra Martínez, Marcelo Jenkins
{"title":"Tools for the evaluation of web accessibility: A systematic literature mapping","authors":"Patricia Agüero-Flores, Christian Quesada-López, Alexandra Martínez, Marcelo Jenkins","doi":"10.1109/JoCICI48395.2019.9105263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, different tools have been proposed to automate the evaluation of the web contents accessibility criteria proposed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). These tools can verify that a website complies with web accessibility standards such as WCAG, but the results of the evaluation may depend on the tool used. This study identifies and characterizes web accessibility assessment tools through a systematic literature mapping. A total of 50 articles were analyzed. We report the accessibility criteria evaluated by each tool as well as the main challenges related to the evaluations.","PeriodicalId":154731,"journal":{"name":"2019 IV Jornadas Costarricenses de Investigación en Computación e Informática (JoCICI)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IV Jornadas Costarricenses de Investigación en Computación e Informática (JoCICI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JoCICI48395.2019.9105263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, different tools have been proposed to automate the evaluation of the web contents accessibility criteria proposed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). These tools can verify that a website complies with web accessibility standards such as WCAG, but the results of the evaluation may depend on the tool used. This study identifies and characterizes web accessibility assessment tools through a systematic literature mapping. A total of 50 articles were analyzed. We report the accessibility criteria evaluated by each tool as well as the main challenges related to the evaluations.
评估网页可及性的工具:系统的文献映射
近年来,人们提出了不同的工具来自动评估万维网联盟(W3C)提出的web内容可访问性标准。这些工具可以验证网站是否符合web可访问性标准,如WCAG,但评估结果可能取决于所使用的工具。本研究通过系统的文献映射来识别和表征网页可访问性评估工具。共分析了50篇文章。我们报告了每个工具评估的可访问性标准,以及与评估相关的主要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信