Att teoretisera om mening genom exempel

Ingeborg Löfgren
{"title":"Att teoretisera om mening genom exempel","authors":"Ingeborg Löfgren","doi":"10.54797/tfl.v52i1.2215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theorizing Meaning Through Examples: Ordinary Language Criticism, “Sam-vett” and the Difficulty of Reality\nIn this article I set out to exemplify how one can, from within the tradition of Ordinary Language Criticism (OLC), theorize about literary meaning through concrete interpretative work. I proceed by attending to what I take to be a particular interpretive hard case, namely, the Swedish author and activist Sara Lidman’s (1923-2004) notion of “sam-vett”. Or more precisely: I attend to one specific usage of that word, namely the male protagonist Didrik Mårtensson’s usage of the word in Lidman’s novel Järnkronan (1985). Lidman invented the word “sam-vett” in the early 1980s but never defined it; she simply put it to use in various texts and contexts. By comparing how the problematic nature of “sam-vett” presents itself for Didrik in Järnkronan, with the Wittgensteinian philosopher Cora Diamond’s notion of “the difficulty of reality”, I argue that Lidman’s “sam-vett” – in this specific usage – expresses an experience of encountering something ineffable. In my comparative reading I argue that rather than offering a road to a more-than-human communality and knowledge beyond words, however, Didrik’s usage of “sam-vett” expresses a fantasy of being able to escape a guilty conscience through the letting go of sanity and sense-making altogether. So, while Didrik encounters “a difficulty of reality” that shoulders him out (at least partially) from language his attempt at imagining a non-linguistic pan-species community in the name of “sam-vett” nevertheless fails. Instead, Didrik’s “sam-vett” becomes something of a false idol, a delirious idea that only appears to make sense.","PeriodicalId":202881,"journal":{"name":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","volume":"316 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v52i1.2215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theorizing Meaning Through Examples: Ordinary Language Criticism, “Sam-vett” and the Difficulty of Reality In this article I set out to exemplify how one can, from within the tradition of Ordinary Language Criticism (OLC), theorize about literary meaning through concrete interpretative work. I proceed by attending to what I take to be a particular interpretive hard case, namely, the Swedish author and activist Sara Lidman’s (1923-2004) notion of “sam-vett”. Or more precisely: I attend to one specific usage of that word, namely the male protagonist Didrik Mårtensson’s usage of the word in Lidman’s novel Järnkronan (1985). Lidman invented the word “sam-vett” in the early 1980s but never defined it; she simply put it to use in various texts and contexts. By comparing how the problematic nature of “sam-vett” presents itself for Didrik in Järnkronan, with the Wittgensteinian philosopher Cora Diamond’s notion of “the difficulty of reality”, I argue that Lidman’s “sam-vett” – in this specific usage – expresses an experience of encountering something ineffable. In my comparative reading I argue that rather than offering a road to a more-than-human communality and knowledge beyond words, however, Didrik’s usage of “sam-vett” expresses a fantasy of being able to escape a guilty conscience through the letting go of sanity and sense-making altogether. So, while Didrik encounters “a difficulty of reality” that shoulders him out (at least partially) from language his attempt at imagining a non-linguistic pan-species community in the name of “sam-vett” nevertheless fails. Instead, Didrik’s “sam-vett” becomes something of a false idol, a delirious idea that only appears to make sense.
通过实例将意义理论化:普通语言批评、“山姆-维特”和现实的困难在本文中,我将举例说明如何从普通语言批评(OLC)的传统中,通过具体的解释工作将文学意义理论化。接下来,我将关注我认为是一个特殊的难以解释的案例,即瑞典作家和活动家萨拉·利德曼(1923-2004)的“萨姆-维特”概念。或者更准确地说:我关注这个词的一个具体用法,即男主角Didrik mmatrtensson在Lidman的小说Järnkronan(1985)中对这个词的使用。利德曼在20世纪80年代初发明了“山姆-维特”这个词,但从未给它下过定义;她只是在不同的文本和语境中使用它。通过比较“sam-vett”的问题本质如何在Järnkronan中呈现给Didrik,与维特根斯坦哲学家Cora Diamond的“现实的困难”的概念,我认为Lidman的“sam-vett”——在这个特定的用法中——表达了一种遇到不可言说的事物的体验。在我的比较阅读中,我认为,Didrik对“sam-vett”的使用表达了一种幻想,即能够通过完全放弃理智和意义建构来逃避罪恶感,而不是提供一条通往超越人类的共同体和超越语言的知识的道路。因此,尽管Didrik遇到了“现实的困难”,使他(至少部分地)脱离了语言,但他以“sam-vett”的名义想象一个非语言的泛物种群落的尝试还是失败了。相反,Didrik的“sam-vett”变成了一个虚假的偶像,一个看似有意义的疯狂想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信