{"title":"On pseudo-non-finite clauses in Welsh","authors":"Olivier Bonami, R. Borsley, M. Tallerman","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2016.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nLanguages differ in how they employ finite and non-finite\nclauses. Welsh finite and non-finite clauses have a similar\ndistribution to their counterparts in English. However, it doesn’t\nlook like this because Welsh has certain finite clauses which look\nrather like non-finite clauses. We examine two types of\npseudo-non-finite clauses: finite \"bod\" clauses and finite \"i\"\nclauses. We argue that both cases are instances of a mismatch between\nsyntax and morphology, while the latter only involves periphrasis. We\nprovide an HPSG analysis capturing similarities and differences\nbetween these two constructions and canonical finite and nonfinite\nclauses.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"28 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2016.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Languages differ in how they employ finite and non-finite
clauses. Welsh finite and non-finite clauses have a similar
distribution to their counterparts in English. However, it doesn’t
look like this because Welsh has certain finite clauses which look
rather like non-finite clauses. We examine two types of
pseudo-non-finite clauses: finite "bod" clauses and finite "i"
clauses. We argue that both cases are instances of a mismatch between
syntax and morphology, while the latter only involves periphrasis. We
provide an HPSG analysis capturing similarities and differences
between these two constructions and canonical finite and nonfinite
clauses.