A Study on the Comparison of Development Gains Distribution Effects of Privately-Owned House with Public Purpose

Seong-Young Lee, Chang-heum Byeon
{"title":"A Study on the Comparison of Development Gains Distribution Effects of Privately-Owned House with Public Purpose","authors":"Seong-Young Lee, Chang-heum Byeon","doi":"10.24957/hsr.2023.31.3.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study confirmed the effect of redeeming development gains from privately owned houses with public purpose and public sale houses by comparing the distribution ratio of development gains taken by the public and by individuals. Using the A2-1 block in Namyanrposegju’s Byeolnae district as a case site, the degree of distribution of development profits by each type is compared when the units are sold six years after moving in. As a result, the general type of public sale house (84.9%) is the type of housing for which the initial buyer takes more than 50% of the development profit, followed by the Newlyweds Hope Town B type (30% loan, 2 children) (73.4%), and the sharing type of public sale house (65%). The land leased house not only has minimal development gains taken by the initial buyer, but it is also likely that the original value of the building will be eroded due to increased depreciation costs over time. This study is meaningful as it can provide the basic data to compare the development gains distribution effects of the current intermediate housing model before developing various intermediate housing models that properly share development gains and continuously supply low-cost housing.","PeriodicalId":255849,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24957/hsr.2023.31.3.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study confirmed the effect of redeeming development gains from privately owned houses with public purpose and public sale houses by comparing the distribution ratio of development gains taken by the public and by individuals. Using the A2-1 block in Namyanrposegju’s Byeolnae district as a case site, the degree of distribution of development profits by each type is compared when the units are sold six years after moving in. As a result, the general type of public sale house (84.9%) is the type of housing for which the initial buyer takes more than 50% of the development profit, followed by the Newlyweds Hope Town B type (30% loan, 2 children) (73.4%), and the sharing type of public sale house (65%). The land leased house not only has minimal development gains taken by the initial buyer, but it is also likely that the original value of the building will be eroded due to increased depreciation costs over time. This study is meaningful as it can provide the basic data to compare the development gains distribution effects of the current intermediate housing model before developing various intermediate housing models that properly share development gains and continuously supply low-cost housing.
私房与公房发展收益分配效应比较研究
本研究通过比较公共和个人获得的发展收益的分配比例,证实了将私人住宅的发展收益赎回为公共用途住宅和公售住宅的效果。以南延坡州市别内区A2-1街区为例,比较了入住6年后出售的各种类型的开发利润分配情况。因此,一般类型的公售住宅(84.9%)是首次购房者获得50%以上开发利润的住宅类型,其次是新婚夫妇希望镇B型(30%贷款,2个孩子)(73.4%)和共享型公售住宅(65%)。土地租赁房不仅对最初的买家来说只有最小的开发收益,而且随着时间的推移,由于折旧成本的增加,建筑物的原始价值很可能会受到侵蚀。本研究的意义在于可以为比较现有中间住房模式的发展收益分配效果提供基础数据,从而开发出各种适当分享发展收益并持续供应低成本住房的中间住房模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信