From Fear to Preparedness: A Systematic Review of Parents' Awareness and Use of Epinephrine Autoinjectors

T. Satnarine, Zareen Zohara, Ademiniyi Adelekun, Kofi D Seffah, Korlos Salib, Lana Dardari, Maher Taha, Purva Dahat, Stacy Toriola, Safeera Khan
{"title":"From Fear to Preparedness: A Systematic Review of Parents' Awareness and Use of Epinephrine Autoinjectors","authors":"T. Satnarine, Zareen Zohara, Ademiniyi Adelekun, Kofi D Seffah, Korlos Salib, Lana Dardari, Maher Taha, Purva Dahat, Stacy Toriola, Safeera Khan","doi":"10.32996/jmhs.2023.4.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review aims to synthesize existing literature on parents' knowledge and use of epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) and identify factors associated with correct use and barriers to education and training. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using keywords and MeSH terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, and papers were screened for eligibility. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. A total of 1008 papers were initially identified, with 214 remaining after applying filters. Following screening and quality assessment, seven observational studies were included in the review. The studies found that while most caregivers claimed to carry an EAI on their person and practiced its use at home after training, it was often not used during allergic reactions. The most common reason cited for not using EAI was uncertainty about whether the symptoms were severe enough to warrant EAI use. The lack of EAI use was significantly associated with lower caregiver confidence in using EAI. Those who received EAI during oral food challenges (OFC) and in the community had increased confidence in administering the EAI from pre-OFC to follow-up compared to those who did not receive EAI at all. Targeted interventions and educational strategies should be developed to improve parent knowledge and use of EAIs.","PeriodicalId":162243,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Health Studies","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jmhs.2023.4.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aims to synthesize existing literature on parents' knowledge and use of epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) and identify factors associated with correct use and barriers to education and training. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using keywords and MeSH terms. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, and papers were screened for eligibility. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. A total of 1008 papers were initially identified, with 214 remaining after applying filters. Following screening and quality assessment, seven observational studies were included in the review. The studies found that while most caregivers claimed to carry an EAI on their person and practiced its use at home after training, it was often not used during allergic reactions. The most common reason cited for not using EAI was uncertainty about whether the symptoms were severe enough to warrant EAI use. The lack of EAI use was significantly associated with lower caregiver confidence in using EAI. Those who received EAI during oral food challenges (OFC) and in the community had increased confidence in administering the EAI from pre-OFC to follow-up compared to those who did not receive EAI at all. Targeted interventions and educational strategies should be developed to improve parent knowledge and use of EAIs.
从恐惧到准备:父母对肾上腺素自体注射器的认识和使用的系统回顾
本系统综述旨在综合现有关于家长肾上腺素自动注射器(EAIs)知识和使用的文献,找出影响家长正确使用和教育培训障碍的因素。在PubMed和开放获取期刊目录(DOAJ)上使用关键词和MeSH术语进行了全面搜索。建立了纳入和排除标准,并对论文进行了筛选。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具进行质量评估。最初共识别了1008篇论文,经过筛选后剩下214篇。经过筛选和质量评估,本综述纳入了7项观察性研究。研究发现,虽然大多数护理人员声称他们随身携带EAI,并在培训后在家练习使用,但在过敏反应期间通常不会使用EAI。不使用EAI的最常见原因是不确定症状是否严重到需要使用EAI。缺乏EAI的使用与护理者使用EAI的信心较低显著相关。那些在口腔食物挑战(OFC)期间和在社区接受EAI的人与那些根本没有接受EAI的人相比,从OFC前到随访期间,他们对实施EAI的信心有所增加。应该制定有针对性的干预措施和教育策略,以提高家长对情商的认识和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信