The marketability of electric vehicles: battery performance and consumer demand for driving range

K. Kurani, D. Sperling, T. Turrentine
{"title":"The marketability of electric vehicles: battery performance and consumer demand for driving range","authors":"K. Kurani, D. Sperling, T. Turrentine","doi":"10.1109/BCAA.1996.484986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a four-year study of electric vehicle (EV) demand. We focused on a newly defined market segment: multi-car \"hybrid households,\" in which one car has limited driving range. We designed a four-stage mail survey that included a video of EV use and recharging, informational material, a 3-day trip diary, and a series of vehicle choice questions. Respondents had a choice of propulsion systems, body styles and sizes, driving ranges, and other features. The variety of driving ranges offered tested the hypothesis that demand for EVs will be segmented by demand for driving range. Prices of EVs varied, but tended to be up to several thousand dollars higher than those of comparable gasoline vehicles. The questionnaires were administered to 740 multi-car households in 6 metropolitan areas of California. The response rate was 61%. In the second of two vehicle choice scenarios, 37% of the respondents chose battery-powered EVs, with ranges varying from 40 to 150 miles; 10% chose hybrid electrics with ranges up to 180 miles; and 19% chose limited-range natural gas vehicles with ranges of 80-120 miles. Altogether, 66% chose limited-range vehicles. Translating these choices into annual vehicle sales, we find that purchases of pure EVs by hybrid households would account for 7-15% of annual light duty vehicle sales. Based on the current state of EV traction battery development, we infer from these results that any remaining barriers to marketable EVs are not related to the ability of existing batteries to provide adequate driving range.","PeriodicalId":236148,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 11th Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 11th Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BCAA.1996.484986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This paper reports on a four-year study of electric vehicle (EV) demand. We focused on a newly defined market segment: multi-car "hybrid households," in which one car has limited driving range. We designed a four-stage mail survey that included a video of EV use and recharging, informational material, a 3-day trip diary, and a series of vehicle choice questions. Respondents had a choice of propulsion systems, body styles and sizes, driving ranges, and other features. The variety of driving ranges offered tested the hypothesis that demand for EVs will be segmented by demand for driving range. Prices of EVs varied, but tended to be up to several thousand dollars higher than those of comparable gasoline vehicles. The questionnaires were administered to 740 multi-car households in 6 metropolitan areas of California. The response rate was 61%. In the second of two vehicle choice scenarios, 37% of the respondents chose battery-powered EVs, with ranges varying from 40 to 150 miles; 10% chose hybrid electrics with ranges up to 180 miles; and 19% chose limited-range natural gas vehicles with ranges of 80-120 miles. Altogether, 66% chose limited-range vehicles. Translating these choices into annual vehicle sales, we find that purchases of pure EVs by hybrid households would account for 7-15% of annual light duty vehicle sales. Based on the current state of EV traction battery development, we infer from these results that any remaining barriers to marketable EVs are not related to the ability of existing batteries to provide adequate driving range.
电动汽车的市场性:电池性能和消费者对续驶里程的需求
本文报告了一项为期四年的电动汽车需求研究。我们专注于一个新定义的细分市场:多车“混合动力家庭”,其中一辆车的行驶里程有限。我们设计了一个四阶段的邮件调查,包括电动汽车使用和充电的视频,信息材料,3天的旅行日记,以及一系列的车辆选择问题。受访者可以选择推进系统、车身样式和尺寸、行驶范围和其他特征。提供的各种续驶里程验证了电动汽车需求将根据续驶里程需求细分的假设。电动汽车的价格各不相同,但往往比同类汽油车高出几千美元。问卷调查对象是加州6个大都市区740户多车家庭。应答率为61%。在第二种车辆选择场景中,37%的受访者选择电池供电的电动汽车,行驶里程从40英里到150英里不等;10%的人选择续航里程达180英里的混合动力汽车;19%的人选择了续航里程在80-120英里的有限范围天然气汽车。总共有66%的人选择了有限续航里程的汽车。将这些选择转化为年汽车销量,我们发现混合动力家庭购买纯电动汽车将占轻型汽车年销量的7-15%。基于电动汽车牵引电池的发展现状,我们从这些结果中推断,电动汽车市场的任何剩余障碍都与现有电池提供足够续驶里程的能力无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信