Evaluating the usage of Text-To-Speech in K12 education

L. Dai, V. Kritskaia, Evelien van der Velden, Merel M. Jung, M. Postma, M. Louwerse
{"title":"Evaluating the usage of Text-To-Speech in K12 education","authors":"L. Dai, V. Kritskaia, Evelien van der Velden, Merel M. Jung, M. Postma, M. Louwerse","doi":"10.1145/3578837.3578864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With increased interest in the use of virtual avatars for educational purposes, there is a growing need for high-quality text-to-speech solutions. However, the effects of using synthesized speech in educational applications for younger listeners are still unclear as past findings have been inconsistent and most of them have been obtained in a lab setting with adult assessors. Next to that, it is unclear how much training material is needed for high quality speech synthesis. Particularly for low resource languages, the assumption that good quality synthesized speech requires substantial amounts of vocal recordings to train may be hindering the development of TTS-based solutions. In this study, we created four Dutch text-to-speech (TTS) models from different amounts of training material and evaluated the models in terms of voice perception and recall with K12 students in a classroom environment. Results showed that while the original human voice outperformed the synthesized voices in terms of the listening experience and knowledge test score, more hours of training material did not necessarily result in better outcomes suggesting that 10-15 hours of speech material might be sufficient for training a Dutch TTS. A weak positive correlation was found between listening experience and knowledge test performance, with the low listening effort being the most important factor. This outcome suggests that comprehensibility is likely the most important TTS feature for educational applications.","PeriodicalId":150970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increased interest in the use of virtual avatars for educational purposes, there is a growing need for high-quality text-to-speech solutions. However, the effects of using synthesized speech in educational applications for younger listeners are still unclear as past findings have been inconsistent and most of them have been obtained in a lab setting with adult assessors. Next to that, it is unclear how much training material is needed for high quality speech synthesis. Particularly for low resource languages, the assumption that good quality synthesized speech requires substantial amounts of vocal recordings to train may be hindering the development of TTS-based solutions. In this study, we created four Dutch text-to-speech (TTS) models from different amounts of training material and evaluated the models in terms of voice perception and recall with K12 students in a classroom environment. Results showed that while the original human voice outperformed the synthesized voices in terms of the listening experience and knowledge test score, more hours of training material did not necessarily result in better outcomes suggesting that 10-15 hours of speech material might be sufficient for training a Dutch TTS. A weak positive correlation was found between listening experience and knowledge test performance, with the low listening effort being the most important factor. This outcome suggests that comprehensibility is likely the most important TTS feature for educational applications.
评估K12教育中文本到语音的使用
随着人们对将虚拟化身用于教育目的的兴趣日益增加,对高质量文本到语音解决方案的需求也在不断增长。然而,在教育应用中使用合成语音对年轻听众的影响仍然不清楚,因为过去的研究结果不一致,而且大多数研究结果都是在有成人评估人员的实验室环境中获得的。除此之外,还不清楚高质量语音合成需要多少训练材料。特别是对于低资源语言,高质量的合成语音需要大量的录音来训练的假设可能会阻碍基于tts的解决方案的发展。在这项研究中,我们从不同数量的训练材料中创建了四个荷兰语文本到语音(TTS)模型,并在课堂环境中对K12学生的语音感知和记忆进行了评估。结果表明,虽然原始人声在听力体验和知识测试分数方面优于合成声音,但更多的训练材料并不一定会产生更好的结果,这表明10-15小时的语音材料可能足以训练荷兰TTS。听力经验与知识测试成绩呈弱正相关,听力努力程度低是最重要的因素。这一结果表明,可理解性可能是教育应用中最重要的TTS特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信