Organizational working time regimes: Drivers, consequences and attempts to change patterns of excessive working hours

B. Blagoev, S. L. Muhr, R. Ortlieb, Georg Schreyögg
{"title":"Organizational working time regimes: Drivers, consequences and attempts to change patterns of excessive working hours","authors":"B. Blagoev, S. L. Muhr, R. Ortlieb, Georg Schreyögg","doi":"10.1177/2397002218791408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 40-hour working week is the norm in Europe, yet some organizations require 60 or more working hours and in investment banks an alarming 120-hour weeks are known to be worked. What is more, these organizations often require workers to be permanently on call and demonstrate high production rates. Consequences of such practices include frazzled employees, with their families’ and their own health under pressure. This article introduces our special issue of the German Journal of Human Resource Management. It tackles the many reasons behind excessive work hours and failed attempts to change working time arrangements in organizations. It first identifies three core ideas in previous research, namely the dispersed nature of regimes of excessive working hours, their high levels of persistence and their constitution at multiple levels of analysis. It then summarizes the contributions in this special issue. Finally, it proposes avenues for future research, such as focusing on the genesis and the historicity of organizational working time regimes, studying the interrelation of factors across multiple levels of analysis, and probing new theories to explain the extreme persistence of excessive working hours. The overarching aim of our special issue in this core area of human resource management is to contribute to an understanding of organizational working time regimes and the tenacity of excessive working hours in an effort to deepen our knowledge of how to change them.","PeriodicalId":206271,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218791408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

A 40-hour working week is the norm in Europe, yet some organizations require 60 or more working hours and in investment banks an alarming 120-hour weeks are known to be worked. What is more, these organizations often require workers to be permanently on call and demonstrate high production rates. Consequences of such practices include frazzled employees, with their families’ and their own health under pressure. This article introduces our special issue of the German Journal of Human Resource Management. It tackles the many reasons behind excessive work hours and failed attempts to change working time arrangements in organizations. It first identifies three core ideas in previous research, namely the dispersed nature of regimes of excessive working hours, their high levels of persistence and their constitution at multiple levels of analysis. It then summarizes the contributions in this special issue. Finally, it proposes avenues for future research, such as focusing on the genesis and the historicity of organizational working time regimes, studying the interrelation of factors across multiple levels of analysis, and probing new theories to explain the extreme persistence of excessive working hours. The overarching aim of our special issue in this core area of human resource management is to contribute to an understanding of organizational working time regimes and the tenacity of excessive working hours in an effort to deepen our knowledge of how to change them.
有组织的工作时间制度:过度工作时间的驱动因素、后果和改变模式的尝试
在欧洲,每周工作40小时是标准,但一些组织要求60小时或更多的工作时间,而在投资银行,每周工作时间达到了惊人的120小时。更重要的是,这些组织经常要求工人随时待命,并显示出高生产率。这种做法的后果包括使雇员感到疲惫,使他们的家人和他们自己的健康受到压力。本文介绍了德国《人力资源管理》杂志的特刊。它解决了过多工作时间背后的许多原因,以及改变组织工作时间安排的失败尝试。本文首先确定了以往研究中的三个核心思想,即过度工作时间制度的分散性,其高水平的持久性以及其在多层次分析中的构成。然后总结了本期特刊的贡献。最后,提出了未来的研究方向,如关注组织工作时间制度的起源和历史,研究多层次分析因素的相互关系,探索新的理论来解释过度工作时间的极端持久性。我们在人力资源管理这一核心领域的特刊的总体目标是促进对组织工作时间制度和过度工作时间的持久性的理解,以加深我们对如何改变它们的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信