“Imagining a More Just World”: Interview with Julie Maldonado

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Julie Maldonado, Mark Schuller, Lacey Benedeck, Halle Boddy, Katelyn Kramer, Evan Blankenberger, Ardyn Cieslak, Christine Jenkins
{"title":"“Imagining a More Just World”: Interview with Julie Maldonado","authors":"Julie Maldonado,&nbsp;Mark Schuller,&nbsp;Lacey Benedeck,&nbsp;Halle Boddy,&nbsp;Katelyn Kramer,&nbsp;Evan Blankenberger,&nbsp;Ardyn Cieslak,&nbsp;Christine Jenkins","doi":"10.1111/napa.12136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is difficult to canonize anthropology and anthropological concepts, in part because of the creative tensions within the discipline's contradictions: a desire and deep respect for local knowledge with a global, comparative perspective, what might be called the “anthropological imagination.” Firmly rooted in—and in defense of—an inclusive vision of humanity, an anthropological imagination inspires “radical empathy.” It offers the scaffolding of a coalitional politics that values the specificity of local struggles but also reaffirms and defends humanity. We must identify the humanity in others, and the common humanity in their struggle, while affirming particular identities and challenging differential privilege: an anthropological imagination inspires radical empathy and solidarity, reminding us, in the words of the World Social Forum, that “another world is possible.” How people learn to cultivate this anthropological imagination and bring it in the service of marginalized groups is not generally discussed, and rarely taught. This article aims to bridge this gap. On October 10, 2018, Julie Maldonado, Associate Director for the Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network (LiKEN), discussed her new book, <i>Seeking Justice in an Energy Sacrifice Zone: Standing on Vanishing Land in Coastal Louisiana</i>, via video-conference with Mark Schuller's Anthropology and Contemporary World Problems class at Northern Illinois University. This interview offers one perspective of a career focused around advocacy anthropology that aims to reach public audiences and policy- and decision-makers in ways that translates scholarly research into information that is most useful for problem solving and enacting change in response to our climate crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45176,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/napa.12136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Anthropological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/napa.12136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is difficult to canonize anthropology and anthropological concepts, in part because of the creative tensions within the discipline's contradictions: a desire and deep respect for local knowledge with a global, comparative perspective, what might be called the “anthropological imagination.” Firmly rooted in—and in defense of—an inclusive vision of humanity, an anthropological imagination inspires “radical empathy.” It offers the scaffolding of a coalitional politics that values the specificity of local struggles but also reaffirms and defends humanity. We must identify the humanity in others, and the common humanity in their struggle, while affirming particular identities and challenging differential privilege: an anthropological imagination inspires radical empathy and solidarity, reminding us, in the words of the World Social Forum, that “another world is possible.” How people learn to cultivate this anthropological imagination and bring it in the service of marginalized groups is not generally discussed, and rarely taught. This article aims to bridge this gap. On October 10, 2018, Julie Maldonado, Associate Director for the Livelihoods Knowledge Exchange Network (LiKEN), discussed her new book, Seeking Justice in an Energy Sacrifice Zone: Standing on Vanishing Land in Coastal Louisiana, via video-conference with Mark Schuller's Anthropology and Contemporary World Problems class at Northern Illinois University. This interview offers one perspective of a career focused around advocacy anthropology that aims to reach public audiences and policy- and decision-makers in ways that translates scholarly research into information that is most useful for problem solving and enacting change in response to our climate crisis.

《想象一个更公正的世界》:采访朱莉·马尔多纳多
要把人类学和人类学概念奉为圣典是很困难的,部分原因是这门学科的矛盾中存在着创造性的紧张关系:一种对地方知识的渴望和深刻尊重,具有全球的、比较的视角,这可能被称为“人类学的想象力”。人类学的想象力牢牢扎根于——并捍卫——人类的包容性愿景,激发了“激进的同理心”。它提供了一个联盟政治的框架,既重视地方斗争的特殊性,又重申和捍卫人性。我们必须在他人身上找到人性,在他们的斗争中找到共同的人性,同时肯定特殊的身份,挑战差别特权:人类学的想象力激发了激进的同情和团结,用世界社会论坛的话来说,提醒我们“另一个世界是可能的”。人们如何学会培养这种人类学的想象力,并将其用于为边缘群体服务,通常没有被讨论,也很少被教授。本文旨在弥合这一差距。2018年10月10日,朱莉·马尔多纳多,生计知识交流网络(LiKEN)副主任,讨论了她的新书,在能源牺牲区寻求正义:站在沿海路易斯安那州消失的土地上,通过视频会议与马克·斯勒的人类学和当代世界问题类在北伊利诺伊大学。这次采访提供了一个以倡导人类学为中心的职业生涯的视角,该职业旨在通过将学术研究转化为最有用的信息来解决问题和制定应对气候危机的变化,从而达到公众受众和政策制定者的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信