The prevalence and predictors of cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetic population of Punjab, India

Shallu Khullar, G. Kaur, Harjot Dhillon, Ritu S. Sharma, K. Mehta, Monica Singh, Puneetpal Singh
{"title":"The prevalence and predictors of cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetic population of Punjab, India","authors":"Shallu Khullar, G. Kaur, Harjot Dhillon, Ritu S. Sharma, K. Mehta, Monica Singh, Puneetpal Singh","doi":"10.4103/2321-0656.193996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The present cross sectional study was carried out on 516 subjects with type 2 diabetes from a tertiary health care hospital to identify the prevalence and predictors of cognitive impairment in diabetes. Materials and Methods: Cognitive impairment was tested using Mini Mental Scale Examination (MMSE), Trail making tests-A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B). Efficiency of these tests to diagnose cognitive impairment was analysed using reliability index (Cronbach's α = 0.82), which ruled out any internal inconsistency. Of the study participants, 174 (33.73%) met the criteria for cognitive impairment and 342 (66.27%) were having normal cognition. Out of 174, 156 diabetic subjects (89.65 percent) were not diagnosed for neurocognitive impairment prior participation. Results: Cognitive impairment was observed to be strongly associated with being a woman (P < 0.001), divorced or separated (P = 0.007), sedentary life style (P = 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), drinking alcohol (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure >120 mmHg (P = 0.003), triglycerides (TG) >150 mg/dl (P = 0.001), high density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl (P = 0.001), statin use (P = 0.009), waist hip ratio in both males and females (P = 0.001), glucose levels >125 mg/dl (P = 0.005) and duration of diabetes >2 years upto 10 years and more than 10 years (P = 0.001) in univariate testing. In multivariate logistic regression model, being a woman was an independent risk factor for cognitive decline, which is two fold higher (OR 2.00 95%CI 1.25-3.20, P = 0.004) than being a man. Other risk factors like glucose levels > 125 mg/dl, systolic blood pressure >120 mmHg, sedentary life style and duration of diabetes >10 years emerged as independent predictors of cognitive impairment in diabetes. Conclusion: In conclusion, the present study revealed that higher prevalence of cognitive impairment in diabetes is evident in population of Punjab, especially in women and majority of these patients remain undiagnosed for it.","PeriodicalId":131259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Health and Diabetes","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Health and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.193996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Abstract Background: The present cross sectional study was carried out on 516 subjects with type 2 diabetes from a tertiary health care hospital to identify the prevalence and predictors of cognitive impairment in diabetes. Materials and Methods: Cognitive impairment was tested using Mini Mental Scale Examination (MMSE), Trail making tests-A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B). Efficiency of these tests to diagnose cognitive impairment was analysed using reliability index (Cronbach's α = 0.82), which ruled out any internal inconsistency. Of the study participants, 174 (33.73%) met the criteria for cognitive impairment and 342 (66.27%) were having normal cognition. Out of 174, 156 diabetic subjects (89.65 percent) were not diagnosed for neurocognitive impairment prior participation. Results: Cognitive impairment was observed to be strongly associated with being a woman (P < 0.001), divorced or separated (P = 0.007), sedentary life style (P = 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), drinking alcohol (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure >120 mmHg (P = 0.003), triglycerides (TG) >150 mg/dl (P = 0.001), high density lipoprotein <40 mg/dl (P = 0.001), statin use (P = 0.009), waist hip ratio in both males and females (P = 0.001), glucose levels >125 mg/dl (P = 0.005) and duration of diabetes >2 years upto 10 years and more than 10 years (P = 0.001) in univariate testing. In multivariate logistic regression model, being a woman was an independent risk factor for cognitive decline, which is two fold higher (OR 2.00 95%CI 1.25-3.20, P = 0.004) than being a man. Other risk factors like glucose levels > 125 mg/dl, systolic blood pressure >120 mmHg, sedentary life style and duration of diabetes >10 years emerged as independent predictors of cognitive impairment in diabetes. Conclusion: In conclusion, the present study revealed that higher prevalence of cognitive impairment in diabetes is evident in population of Punjab, especially in women and majority of these patients remain undiagnosed for it.
印度旁遮普2型糖尿病人群认知功能障碍的患病率及预测因素
背景:本研究对某三级卫生保健医院516例2型糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究,以确定糖尿病患者认知功能障碍的患病率和预测因素。材料与方法:采用简易心理量表(MMSE)、造径测试a、造径测试B (TMT-A、TMT-B)对认知功能障碍进行测试。采用信度指数(Cronbach’s α = 0.82)分析这些测试诊断认知障碍的效率,排除了内部不一致。受试者中,174人(33.73%)符合认知障碍标准,342人(66.27%)认知正常。在174名糖尿病受试者中,156名(89.65%)在参与前未被诊断为神经认知障碍。结果:在单变量检验中,认知障碍与女性(P < 0.001)、离婚或分居(P = 0.007)、久坐生活方式(P = 0.001)、吸烟(P < 0.001)、饮酒(P < 0.001)、收缩压>120 mmHg (P = 0.003)、甘油三酯(TG) >150 mg/dl (P = 0.001)、高密度脂蛋白125 mg/dl (P = 0.005)、糖尿病病程>2年至10年及10年以上(P = 0.001)密切相关。在多因素logistic回归模型中,女性是认知能力下降的独立危险因素,比男性高2倍(OR 2.00 95%CI 1.25-3.20, P = 0.004)。其他危险因素,如血糖水平> 125 mg/dl,收缩压>120 mmHg,久坐不动的生活方式和糖尿病持续时间>10年,成为糖尿病认知障碍的独立预测因素。结论:总而言之,本研究表明,旁遮普人群中糖尿病认知功能障碍的患病率较高,尤其是女性,其中大多数患者未被诊断出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信