Vladislav Yakimovich Grosul and his Concept of the Ethnogenesis of Moldavians

M. Arzakanyan, A. Herzen
{"title":"Vladislav Yakimovich Grosul and his Concept of the Ethnogenesis of Moldavians","authors":"M. Arzakanyan, A. Herzen","doi":"10.55086/sp2262739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost all researchers representing various humanitarian disciplines are distinguished by an integrated approach at the present stage of development of scientific knowledge on the study of the ethnogenesis of Moldavians. One of these scientists is the outstanding historian Vladislav Yakimovich Grosul. As a representative of historical and political Moldavism, in the late 1990s he gave impetus to the revival of interest in the migrationist concept in fundamental science. Vladislav Yakimovich repeatedly drew attention to the fact that not only Romanian, but also Soviet scientists for a long time, in essence, adhered to autochthonous and admigration theories. According to his own confessions, he shared this position, and he himself, however, later decided to reconsider it and actively urged his colleagues to do so. Relying mainly on the works of linguists, archaeologists and anthropologists, he believed that the Romanized population of the Balkan Peninsula were primarily Romanized Illyrians, and not Daco-Thracians, and that the proto-language of the Eastern Romance was also formed in the Balkans. V. Ya. Grosul, admitting the possibility (albeit insignificant) that a small part of the Romanized population could have survived in the Carpathians, has developed the Illyrian version of the migration theory most fully and convincingly so far. The concept of V. Ya. Grosul requires the closest possible attention, critical analysis, especially on the basis of an integrated historical and geographical approach.","PeriodicalId":435723,"journal":{"name":"Stratum plus. Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stratum plus. Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55086/sp2262739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almost all researchers representing various humanitarian disciplines are distinguished by an integrated approach at the present stage of development of scientific knowledge on the study of the ethnogenesis of Moldavians. One of these scientists is the outstanding historian Vladislav Yakimovich Grosul. As a representative of historical and political Moldavism, in the late 1990s he gave impetus to the revival of interest in the migrationist concept in fundamental science. Vladislav Yakimovich repeatedly drew attention to the fact that not only Romanian, but also Soviet scientists for a long time, in essence, adhered to autochthonous and admigration theories. According to his own confessions, he shared this position, and he himself, however, later decided to reconsider it and actively urged his colleagues to do so. Relying mainly on the works of linguists, archaeologists and anthropologists, he believed that the Romanized population of the Balkan Peninsula were primarily Romanized Illyrians, and not Daco-Thracians, and that the proto-language of the Eastern Romance was also formed in the Balkans. V. Ya. Grosul, admitting the possibility (albeit insignificant) that a small part of the Romanized population could have survived in the Carpathians, has developed the Illyrian version of the migration theory most fully and convincingly so far. The concept of V. Ya. Grosul requires the closest possible attention, critical analysis, especially on the basis of an integrated historical and geographical approach.
Vladislav Yakimovich Grosul和他的摩尔达维亚人的民族发生概念
几乎所有代表不同人道主义学科的研究人员都以在研究摩尔达维亚人人种发生的科学知识发展的现阶段采用综合方法而著称。其中一位科学家是杰出的历史学家弗拉季斯拉夫·亚基莫维奇·格罗苏尔。作为历史上和政治上摩尔多瓦主义的代表,在20世纪90年代末,他推动了对基础科学中移民主义概念的兴趣的复兴。Vladislav Yakimovich反复提醒人们注意这样一个事实,即在很长一段时间内,不仅罗马尼亚科学家,而且苏联科学家在本质上坚持本土和移民理论。根据他自己的供词,他赞同这一立场,但他自己后来决定重新考虑这一立场,并积极敦促他的同事这样做。他主要依靠语言学家、考古学家和人类学家的著作,认为巴尔干半岛上罗马化的人口主要是罗马化的伊利里亚人,而不是达可色雷斯人,而且东罗曼语的原始语言也在巴尔干地区形成。诉你。格罗苏尔承认一小部分罗马化人口可能在喀尔巴阡山脉幸存下来的可能性(尽管微不足道),他提出了迄今为止最充分、最令人信服的伊利里亚版本的移民理论。V. Ya的概念。Grosul需要尽可能密切的关注,批判性的分析,特别是在综合历史和地理方法的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信