E-Learning Application in Musical Education: Needs and Possibilities

Z. Šimunović
{"title":"E-Learning Application in Musical Education: Needs and Possibilities","authors":"Z. Šimunović","doi":"10.38069/edenconf-2021-ac0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological progress, or in other words, the digital revolution, a name that more clearly describes the speed and manner in which this process takes place, is changing our world in multiple areas and across multiple levels. Due to the complexity and the organization of the formal education system, the implementation and the use of technological resources does not take place sufficiently and at the same speed in all schools. The entry of technology into teaching depends on the users’ capabilities and technical resources, i.e. on each individual teacher and the technological equipment at his disposal (Nart, 2016). And while the offer of digital tools for creating, performing and sharing music has become widely available and financially acceptable to the general population, which according to Savage (2007) has accelerated the process of technological change in music, the usage of technology in schools with traditional music practice is very rare (Mills Murray, 2000). The availability of ICT resources in music schools, such as technological equipment and licensed computer programs designed to assist learning and teaching in the users’ mother tongue  (especially those intended for music education), the lack of teachers’ competencies required to use technology in teaching, as well as the absence of methodological frameworks that could support planning and executing of such lessons are the main reasons for this delay of technology implementation in the music education system. According to a 2018 study by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), more than 60% of teachers said that they did not feel ready to use digital technology in teaching. By contrast, in a public consultation launched by the European Commission in 2021 on the new Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027), over 60% of teachers stated that they had improved their digital skills and that the crisis caused by COVID-19 forced them to use technology more than usual. In the near future, it is realistic to expect that ICT will be integrated into the usual music teaching curriculum (Crow, 2005). Teachers should advance from being the passive users of digital tools to becoming the digital innovators capable of using technology to improve their teaching skills and consequently achieving greater success with learning outcomes (Koehler Mishra, 2005).But how much is technology changing us as music teachers? How much is our teaching changing? And formal music education in general? What is good about this change and what is not good for our students? We are discussing and emphasizing the benefits that technology provides in music teaching, however, certain special demands, that such education requires, technology cannot fulfil yet. For instance, demonstrating proper body posture, along with correct arm and hand position, avoiding injuries while performing music (Waddell Williamon, 2019) or delivering online teaching at a high artistic level (Adileh, 2012). These are all actions that, in addition to multidimensional activities, presuppose a “live” teacher (Ruismäki Juvonen, 2009), a “live’’ model observed and followed by the students with more of their senses than just sight and hearing. Through the method of interviews with music school teachers, we will try to find answers to the questions posed here and some additional ones. The aim of this paper is to encourage the scientists and teachers in music education to think about and find the best solutions for optimal and purposeful use of new technological achievements.","PeriodicalId":315718,"journal":{"name":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","volume":"15 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2021-ac0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological progress, or in other words, the digital revolution, a name that more clearly describes the speed and manner in which this process takes place, is changing our world in multiple areas and across multiple levels. Due to the complexity and the organization of the formal education system, the implementation and the use of technological resources does not take place sufficiently and at the same speed in all schools. The entry of technology into teaching depends on the users’ capabilities and technical resources, i.e. on each individual teacher and the technological equipment at his disposal (Nart, 2016). And while the offer of digital tools for creating, performing and sharing music has become widely available and financially acceptable to the general population, which according to Savage (2007) has accelerated the process of technological change in music, the usage of technology in schools with traditional music practice is very rare (Mills Murray, 2000). The availability of ICT resources in music schools, such as technological equipment and licensed computer programs designed to assist learning and teaching in the users’ mother tongue  (especially those intended for music education), the lack of teachers’ competencies required to use technology in teaching, as well as the absence of methodological frameworks that could support planning and executing of such lessons are the main reasons for this delay of technology implementation in the music education system. According to a 2018 study by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), more than 60% of teachers said that they did not feel ready to use digital technology in teaching. By contrast, in a public consultation launched by the European Commission in 2021 on the new Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027), over 60% of teachers stated that they had improved their digital skills and that the crisis caused by COVID-19 forced them to use technology more than usual. In the near future, it is realistic to expect that ICT will be integrated into the usual music teaching curriculum (Crow, 2005). Teachers should advance from being the passive users of digital tools to becoming the digital innovators capable of using technology to improve their teaching skills and consequently achieving greater success with learning outcomes (Koehler Mishra, 2005).But how much is technology changing us as music teachers? How much is our teaching changing? And formal music education in general? What is good about this change and what is not good for our students? We are discussing and emphasizing the benefits that technology provides in music teaching, however, certain special demands, that such education requires, technology cannot fulfil yet. For instance, demonstrating proper body posture, along with correct arm and hand position, avoiding injuries while performing music (Waddell Williamon, 2019) or delivering online teaching at a high artistic level (Adileh, 2012). These are all actions that, in addition to multidimensional activities, presuppose a “live” teacher (Ruismäki Juvonen, 2009), a “live’’ model observed and followed by the students with more of their senses than just sight and hearing. Through the method of interviews with music school teachers, we will try to find answers to the questions posed here and some additional ones. The aim of this paper is to encourage the scientists and teachers in music education to think about and find the best solutions for optimal and purposeful use of new technological achievements.
电子学习在音乐教育中的应用:需要与可能性
技术进步,或者换句话说,数字革命,这个名字更清楚地描述了这个过程发生的速度和方式,正在多个领域和多个层面改变我们的世界。由于正规教育系统的复杂性和组织性,技术资源的实施和利用并不是在所有学校都充分和以同样的速度进行。技术进入教学取决于使用者的能力和技术资源,即每个教师和他所拥有的技术设备(Nart, 2016)。虽然提供数字工具来创作、表演和分享音乐已经变得广泛可用,并且在经济上被普通大众所接受,根据Savage(2007)的说法,这加速了音乐技术变革的进程,但在学校中使用传统音乐实践的技术是非常罕见的(Mills Murray, 2000)。音乐学校中信息通信技术资源的可用性,如技术设备和授权的计算机程序,旨在帮助以用户的母语学习和教学(特别是那些用于音乐教育的),教师缺乏在教学中使用技术所需的能力,以及缺乏可以支持这些课程的规划和执行的方法框架是音乐教育系统中技术实施延迟的主要原因。根据经济合作与发展组织(OECD) 2018年的一项研究,超过60%的教师表示,他们觉得自己还没有准备好在教学中使用数字技术。相比之下,在欧盟委员会于2021年就新的数字教育行动计划(2021-2027)发起的公众咨询中,超过60%的教师表示他们已经提高了数字技能,2019冠状病毒病造成的危机迫使他们比平时更多地使用技术。在不久的将来,ICT将被整合到通常的音乐教学课程中是现实的(Crow, 2005)。教师应该从数字工具的被动使用者转变为能够利用技术提高教学技能的数字创新者,从而在学习成果方面取得更大的成功(Koehler Mishra, 2005)。但是,作为音乐教师,科技在多大程度上改变了我们?我们的教学改变了多少?一般的正规音乐教育呢?这种变化对我们的学生有什么好处,又有什么坏处?我们正在讨论和强调技术在音乐教学中提供的好处,然而,这种教育需要的某些特殊要求,技术还不能满足。例如,展示正确的身体姿势,以及正确的手臂和手的位置,在演奏音乐时避免受伤(Waddell Williamon, 2019)或提供高艺术水平的在线教学(Adileh, 2012)。除了多维度的活动之外,所有这些行为都以一个“活的”老师为前提(Ruismäki Juvonen, 2009),一个“活的”模型,由学生观察和遵循,而不仅仅是视觉和听觉。通过对音乐学校教师的访谈,我们将试图找到这里提出的问题和一些附加问题的答案。本文的目的是鼓励音乐教育的科学家和教师思考并找到最佳的解决方案,以优化和有目的地使用新技术成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信