Stuart Hall, a peerless mediator

G. Mclennan, Bruce Robbins, Angela Mcrobbie, B. Louis, C. Hall
{"title":"Stuart Hall, a peerless mediator","authors":"G. Mclennan, Bruce Robbins, Angela Mcrobbie, B. Louis, C. Hall","doi":"10.3898/soun.79.04.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors discuss Stuart Hall's lifelong critical engagement with Marxism - though his was a complex, subtle, agonistic, Marxism, where nothing is taken for granted. This engagement continued even as postcoloniality, ethnicity, race and identity steadily came to the centre of Hall's\n attention, constituting ways of thinking that in some ways represented a departure. Hall can be seen as a mediator, both within Marxism - for example structuralism versus culturalism - and between Marxism and other discourses, finding areas in common as well as difference, respecting\n aspects of a position without endorsing whole positions; and in so doing transforming the problem under consideration. He is also discussed as an organic intellectual, who - though with no assumption of a shared class or shared party - sought to create a collective self-consciousness,\n a coalition, that could offer an effective challenge to the state. The concept of conjuncture is an important part of these ideas. These aspects of Hall's work are discussed further in relation to racialisation and racism, where Hall is seen as committed to both analytic and practical observation,\n and to humanism as well as Marxism: the people at the centre of the analysis are agents not categories. Hall was not aiming to bring things to a rounded, validity-seeking coherence, but to always leave some strands open: his thinking is constitutively open. At the same time his underlying,\n very simple, message is that, in some way or another, the many issues we face are all connected, and we should never give up the integrative pluralism of political thinking. The great danger is fragmented pluralism, where the politics of difference, wherever the differences are, leads\n to political de-alignment rather than coalitional unity.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.79.04.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors discuss Stuart Hall's lifelong critical engagement with Marxism - though his was a complex, subtle, agonistic, Marxism, where nothing is taken for granted. This engagement continued even as postcoloniality, ethnicity, race and identity steadily came to the centre of Hall's attention, constituting ways of thinking that in some ways represented a departure. Hall can be seen as a mediator, both within Marxism - for example structuralism versus culturalism - and between Marxism and other discourses, finding areas in common as well as difference, respecting aspects of a position without endorsing whole positions; and in so doing transforming the problem under consideration. He is also discussed as an organic intellectual, who - though with no assumption of a shared class or shared party - sought to create a collective self-consciousness, a coalition, that could offer an effective challenge to the state. The concept of conjuncture is an important part of these ideas. These aspects of Hall's work are discussed further in relation to racialisation and racism, where Hall is seen as committed to both analytic and practical observation, and to humanism as well as Marxism: the people at the centre of the analysis are agents not categories. Hall was not aiming to bring things to a rounded, validity-seeking coherence, but to always leave some strands open: his thinking is constitutively open. At the same time his underlying, very simple, message is that, in some way or another, the many issues we face are all connected, and we should never give up the integrative pluralism of political thinking. The great danger is fragmented pluralism, where the politics of difference, wherever the differences are, leads to political de-alignment rather than coalitional unity.
斯图亚特·霍尔,无与伦比的调解人
两位作者讨论了斯图尔特·霍尔一生对马克思主义的批判——尽管他的马克思主义是一种复杂、微妙、激烈的马克思主义,没有什么是理所当然的。即使后殖民、种族、种族和身份逐渐成为霍尔关注的中心,这种接触仍在继续,构成了某种程度上代表着背离的思维方式。霍尔可以被看作是马克思主义内部(例如结构主义与文化主义)以及马克思主义与其他话语之间的调解人,他既能找到共同点,也能找到不同点,既尊重立场的各个方面,又不赞同整体立场;在这样做的过程中,正在考虑的问题发生了转变。他也被认为是一个有机的知识分子,尽管没有假设一个共同的阶级或共同的政党,但他试图创造一个集体的自我意识,一个联盟,可以向国家提出有效的挑战。结合点的概念是这些思想的重要组成部分。霍尔作品的这些方面在与种族化和种族主义的关系中得到了进一步的讨论,霍尔被视为致力于分析和实践观察,以及人文主义和马克思主义:分析中心的人是代理人,而不是类别。霍尔的目的并不是要把事情变成一个全面的、寻求有效性的连贯,而是总是留下一些开放的线索:他的思想在本质上是开放的。与此同时,他的潜在的,非常简单的信息是,在某种程度上,我们面临的许多问题都是相互联系的,我们永远不应该放弃政治思维的综合多元化。巨大的危险是支离破碎的多元主义,在这种情况下,无论分歧在哪里,分歧的政治都会导致政治上的不一致,而不是联盟的统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信