Hypertext, Social Media, and Civic Engagement: How Hypertext is Ruining the World, and Might Just Save It

J. Wobbrock
{"title":"Hypertext, Social Media, and Civic Engagement: How Hypertext is Ruining the World, and Might Just Save It","authors":"J. Wobbrock","doi":"10.1145/3406853.3432660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is facing massive problems that no single nation can solve. Global warming, COVID-19, abject poverty, endless wars, widening inequality, religious extremism, racial discrimination, white supremacy, and mental health crises are enormous threats to human flourishing and even human survival. These problems require coordinated efforts on a global scale that, thus far, the nations of the world have rarely managed to mount. Essential to societies addressing these problems is the ability to agree on facts, to view science as authoritative, and to engage in vigorous constructive dialog about possible solutions to these problems without vilifying those of differing opinion. Unfortunately, as these difficult problems have grown more insurmountable, so too has the polarization separating people on opposing sides, especially in the U.S. Just as these problems threaten to overtake us, we seem less capable of devising solutions and coordinating efforts to combat them. Today, social media is inundated in rhetoric about these issues, but this rhetoric is rarely constructive. Social media platforms encourage viral outrage as they reinforce polarized views that monetize hyperlinks as targeted advertisements. Bombastic \"debates\" thrive on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Discord, and other platforms, but rarely change anyone's mind. President Trump has almost 90 million followers on Twitter, a platform he has used throughout his presidency to communicate directly to his followers, but his tweets have only exacerbated polarization, promulgated fake news, promoted extremism, and contributed to the rejection of shared truths. Hypertext and hyperlinks are the key features of social media platforms that connect users to online information, but too often this \"information\" is misinformation, disinformation, fake news, propaganda, or conspiracy theory used as \"proof\" for specious claims. People share articles without verifying them and often without even reading them. Our divisive discourse becomes more polarizing and self-affirming, putting solutions to major problems further out of reach. But just as hyperlinked social media subverts our discourse, it also has the power to connect us to the truth, to facts, to debunked conspiracy theories, and to a diversity of ideas. Social media platforms have begun to flag questionable claims and hyperlink us to facts. Novel user interfaces can aid in our ability to separate fact from fiction and engage in healthy online discourse. Douglas Engelbart's pioneering hypertext design boosted individual human capability; so, too, can hyperlinked social media boost our collective civic capabilities. In this keynote, I will characterize the challenges we face and show examples of how we can promote truth, facts, empathy, trust, and constructive dialog in online spaces, so that we can solve our world's greatest problems.","PeriodicalId":388140,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406853.3432660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world is facing massive problems that no single nation can solve. Global warming, COVID-19, abject poverty, endless wars, widening inequality, religious extremism, racial discrimination, white supremacy, and mental health crises are enormous threats to human flourishing and even human survival. These problems require coordinated efforts on a global scale that, thus far, the nations of the world have rarely managed to mount. Essential to societies addressing these problems is the ability to agree on facts, to view science as authoritative, and to engage in vigorous constructive dialog about possible solutions to these problems without vilifying those of differing opinion. Unfortunately, as these difficult problems have grown more insurmountable, so too has the polarization separating people on opposing sides, especially in the U.S. Just as these problems threaten to overtake us, we seem less capable of devising solutions and coordinating efforts to combat them. Today, social media is inundated in rhetoric about these issues, but this rhetoric is rarely constructive. Social media platforms encourage viral outrage as they reinforce polarized views that monetize hyperlinks as targeted advertisements. Bombastic "debates" thrive on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Discord, and other platforms, but rarely change anyone's mind. President Trump has almost 90 million followers on Twitter, a platform he has used throughout his presidency to communicate directly to his followers, but his tweets have only exacerbated polarization, promulgated fake news, promoted extremism, and contributed to the rejection of shared truths. Hypertext and hyperlinks are the key features of social media platforms that connect users to online information, but too often this "information" is misinformation, disinformation, fake news, propaganda, or conspiracy theory used as "proof" for specious claims. People share articles without verifying them and often without even reading them. Our divisive discourse becomes more polarizing and self-affirming, putting solutions to major problems further out of reach. But just as hyperlinked social media subverts our discourse, it also has the power to connect us to the truth, to facts, to debunked conspiracy theories, and to a diversity of ideas. Social media platforms have begun to flag questionable claims and hyperlink us to facts. Novel user interfaces can aid in our ability to separate fact from fiction and engage in healthy online discourse. Douglas Engelbart's pioneering hypertext design boosted individual human capability; so, too, can hyperlinked social media boost our collective civic capabilities. In this keynote, I will characterize the challenges we face and show examples of how we can promote truth, facts, empathy, trust, and constructive dialog in online spaces, so that we can solve our world's greatest problems.
超文本,社会媒体和公民参与:超文本是如何毁灭世界的,也许只是拯救它
世界正面临着任何一个国家都无法解决的巨大问题。全球变暖、新冠疫情、赤贫、无休止的战争、不断扩大的不平等、宗教极端主义、种族歧视、白人至上、精神健康危机等,都是对人类繁荣乃至人类生存的巨大威胁。这些问题需要在全球范围内作出协调一致的努力,而迄今为止,世界各国很少能做到这一点。社会解决这些问题的关键是能够就事实达成一致,将科学视为权威,并就这些问题的可能解决方案进行积极的建设性对话,而不是诋毁不同意见。不幸的是,随着这些难题变得越来越难以克服,两极分化也变得越来越严重,尤其是在美国。正当这些问题威胁着我们的时候,我们似乎越来越没有能力制定解决方案并协调各方努力来对抗它们。今天,社交媒体上充斥着关于这些问题的言论,但这些言论很少是建设性的。社交媒体平台助长了病毒式的愤怒,因为它们强化了两极分化的观点,将超链接作为定向广告货币化。夸夸其谈的“辩论”在Facebook、Twitter、Reddit、Discord和其他平台上盛行,但很少能改变任何人的想法。特朗普总统在推特上有近9000万粉丝,在他担任总统期间,他一直利用这个平台直接与粉丝沟通,但他的推文只会加剧两极分化,传播假新闻,宣扬极端主义,并助长对共同真理的拒绝。超文本和超链接是社交媒体平台将用户与在线信息联系起来的关键特征,但这些“信息”往往是错误信息、虚假信息、假新闻、宣传或阴谋论,被用作似是而非的说法的“证据”。人们分享文章而不进行验证,甚至经常没有阅读。我们分裂的话语变得更加两极分化和自我肯定,使重大问题的解决方案更加遥不可及。但是,就像超链接的社交媒体颠覆了我们的话语一样,它也有能力将我们与真相、事实、被揭穿的阴谋论以及各种各样的观点联系起来。社交媒体平台已经开始标记可疑的说法,并将我们与事实超链接起来。新颖的用户界面可以帮助我们区分事实和虚构,并参与健康的在线讨论。道格拉斯·恩格尔巴特(Douglas Engelbart)开创性的超文本设计提高了个人的能力;超链接的社交媒体也能提高我们的集体公民能力。在这次主题演讲中,我将描述我们面临的挑战,并举例说明我们如何在网络空间中促进真相、事实、同理心、信任和建设性对话,从而解决我们这个世界上最大的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信