M. Bouilhol, M. Foessel, J. Cabaret
{"title":"The Eye of the Farmer and Detection of Animals in Need of Anthelmintic Treatment in Organic Meat Sheep Flocks","authors":"M. Bouilhol, M. Foessel, J. Cabaret","doi":"10.2174/1874318801105010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic meat sheep producers are limited by their access to and permitted use of synthetic drugs to effectively control internal parasites, and they are limited further still, by the narrow array of efficient alternative drugs available to them. The use of targeted selective treatments, for the control of parasites, e.g. treating only the lambs that cannot cope with infection, would be of interest. The difficulty is in identifying those specific lambs in need of treatment. FAMACHA © (an anaemia indicator) has been used with success in tropical areas where the blood sucking worm Haemonchus contortus is the main gastrointestinal nematode. From their own experience, farmers may also be able to detect lambs in poor, average or good condition, possibly relative to parasite infection burden, a method referred to as farmers' eye score. Using the farmers'eye score to judge lambs in need of treatment was not found to be fully efficient. It was however, significantly related to the presence of Moniezia eggs and to the number of Trichuris and possibly Nematodirus eggs in faeces but remained unrelated to the excretion of other gastrointestinal nematode eggs. The farmers'eye score was in agreement with the average faecal egg counts but the accuracy of individual detection of lambs in need of treatment, remained low (49% correctly classified). The FAMACHA © had an even lower efficiency to detect lambs requiring treatment. The farmers'eye score when correcting for farm variability was improved and highly correlated to the infection with Nematodirus. The farmers'eye score should be improved using pathophysiological indicators (diarrhoea score, weight gains..) or/and by harmonisation among farmers, if it is to be relied upon to detect animals in need of anthelmintic treatment in the future.","PeriodicalId":214092,"journal":{"name":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874318801105010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
农民的眼光与有机肉羊群中需要驱虫动物的检测
有机肉羊生产商在获取和获准使用合成药物以有效控制体内寄生虫方面受到限制,而他们可获得的有效替代药物种类有限,这进一步限制了他们。使用有针对性的选择性治疗来控制寄生虫,例如,只治疗无法应对感染的羔羊,将是令人感兴趣的。困难在于确定需要治疗的特定羔羊。FAMACHA©(贫血指标)在热带地区的应用取得了成功,那里的主要胃肠道线虫是吸血虫弯血虫。根据他们自己的经验,农民也可能能够检测出状况较差、一般或良好的羔羊,这可能与寄生虫感染负担有关,这种方法被称为农民视力评分。利用农户眼评分来判断需要治疗的羔羊并非完全有效。然而,它与粪中滴虫卵的存在和线虫卵的数量显著相关,但与其他胃肠道线虫卵的排泄无关。农民的视力评分与平均粪卵数一致,但需要治疗的羔羊个体检测的准确性仍然很低(正确率为49%)。FAMACHA©在检测需要治疗的羔羊方面效率更低。校正农场变异性后,农民的视力评分有所提高,且与线虫感染高度相关。农民的视力评分应使用病理生理指标(腹泻评分、体重增加等)或/并通过农民之间的协调来提高,如果要依靠它来检测未来需要驱虫治疗的动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。